Re: [PATCH 2/2] [D] Remove search_parents parameter from d_lookup_symbol_imports

[Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org>]

On 29 October 2015 at 16:32, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> wrote:
> On 26 October 2015 at 01:17, Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 19 October 2015 at 17:42, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/11/2015 01:01 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>> > Whilst looking at part one, a moment of insight came to me and I
>>>> > realized this code is completely nonsensical.
>>>> >
>>>> > For a start, when importing modules, you don't gain access to all
>>>> > parent packages of the given module.
>>>> >
>>>> > To add some confusion, even the comment was wrong.  It doesn't even
>>>> > cater for the example given (it's d_lookup_symbol_module that walks up
>>>> > each block scope).
>>>> >
>>>> > I feel embarrassed it didn't come to me before. :-)
>>>>
>>>> The usual penance is writing test cases.  :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> It helps if there is a compiler readily available to compile said
>>> tests.  However, there likely is a way to get around this that I'm not
>>> aware of. (Skip certain tests if a compiler doesn't exist?  ;-)
>>>
>>> With this patch though, it's all dead code.  Hard to write a test for
>>> something that is unreachable.
>>
>> Would the testsuite's DWARF assembler help here?
>> IOW, write the test in DWARF, not D.
>
> Yes, that too, it's just a process that I can foresee taking a while
> to get right.
>
> Iain.

[Apologies for the necromancing]

I've managed to finally get round to producing a reduced DWARF test
for 1/2 in this series.  However I'm not able to produce one for this,
as it's just a refactor of dead code.

Iain.