Re: [gdbserver/patch] Z packet support

[Paul Schlie <schlie@comcast.net>]

> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> If you want to make cosmetic structural changes to gdbserver, and
> can show that they actually have benefit, then feel free to file a
> copyright assignment and submit patches yourself.
> 
> As it happens:
>   1. I don't care either way.

- understood.

>   2. Please re-read the comment; it should not be void *.  It is also
>      required that it be harmless for CORE_ADDR to be too large; see
>      MIPS n32 vs n64.
[ Regarding: And while at it, move CORE_ADDR tweak server.h to wherever
  it likely belongs? (and/or redefine it to void* if more appropriate)? ]

- sorry, it simply seemed implied by your own comment on the subject:

  "CORE_ADDR is always a long long in gdbserver, so your sizeof (addr)
   probably doesn't work right for 32-bit targets.  I guess sizeof
   (void *) is always right for this, though... at least for the kinds
   of targets gdbserver supports now."

  combined with it's own FIXME comment:

  /* FIXME: This should probably be autoconf'd for.  It's an integer type
   at least the size of a (void *).  */
  typedef long long CORE_ADDR;

>   3. There are nowhere near enough exported functions to justify
>      proliferating headers.

- sorry, guess I always considered "proliferating headers" as required
  a superior alternative to the maintenance problems which proliferating
  redundant declarations otherwise creates.
 
> -- 
> Daniel Jacobowitz