Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aktemur, Tankut Baris" <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/23] Tweak handling of remote errors in response to resumption packet
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 13:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <B98F7326B8E238409968F562D326E1A90D07674D@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190906232807.6191-15-palves@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5748 bytes --]

* On September 7, 2019 1:28 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
> With current master, on a Fedora 27 machine with a kernel with buggy
> watchpoint support, I see:
> 
>   (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: parent: singlethreaded: hardware breakpoints work
>   continue
>   Continuing.
>   warning: Remote failure reply: E01
>   Remote communication error.  Target disconnected.: Connection reset by peer.
>   (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: parent: singlethreaded: watchpoints work
>   continue
>   The program is not being run.
>   (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: parent: singlethreaded: breakpoint after the first fork (the program
> is no longer running)
> 
> The FAILs themselves aren't what's interesting here.  What is
> interesting is that with the main multi-target patch applied, I was getting this:
> 
>   (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: parent: singlethreaded: hardware breakpoints work
>   continue
>   Continuing.
>   warning: Remote failure reply: E01
>   /home/pedro/brno/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb-2/build/../src/gdb/inferior.c:285: internal-error: inferior*
> find_inferior_pid(process_stratum_target*, int): Assertion `pid != 0' failed.
>   A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
>   further debugging may prove unreliable.
>   Quit this debugging session? (y or n) FAIL: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: parent: singlethreaded: watchpoints
> work (GDB internal error)
> 
> The problem is that in remote_target::wait_as, we're hitting this:
> 
>   switch (buf[0])
>     {
>     case 'E':		/* Error of some sort.	*/
>       /* We're out of sync with the target now.  Did it continue or
> 	 not?  Not is more likely, so report a stop.  */
>       rs->waiting_for_stop_reply = 0;
> 
>       warning (_("Remote failure reply: %s"), buf);
>       status->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED;
>       status->value.sig = GDB_SIGNAL_0;
>       break;
> 
> which leaves event_ptid as null_ptid.  At the end of the function, we then reach:
> 
>   else if (status->kind != TARGET_WAITKIND_EXITED
> 	   && status->kind != TARGET_WAITKIND_SIGNALLED)
>     {
>       if (event_ptid != null_ptid)
> 	record_currthread (rs, event_ptid);
>       else
> 	event_ptid = inferior_ptid;                 <<<<< here
>     }
> 
> and the trouble is that with the multi-target patch, we'll get here
> with inferior_ptid as null_ptid too.  That is done exactly to find
> these implicit assumptions that inferior_ptid is a good choice for
> default thread, which isn't generaly true.
> 
> I first thought of fixing this in the "case 'E'" path, but, given that
> this "event_ptid = inferior_ptid" path is also taken when the remote
> target does not support threads at all, no thread-related packets or
> extensions, it's better to fix it in latter path, to handle all
> scenarios that miss reporting a thread.
> 
> That's what this patch does.
>

A similar problem could occur in case of an exit event, too -- for instance,
if the remote target does not support the multi-process packet or if the
packet is disabled.

This can be checked by modifying the test

  testsuite/gdb.server/connect-without-multi-process.exp

to continue the inferior to termination.

To also catch the process exit case, the coverage of the patch can be
expanded.  Instead of 

   else
     /* A process exit.  Invalidate our notion of current thread.  */
     record_currthread (rs, minus_one_ptid);

the following can be done:

   else
     {
       /* A process exit.  Invalidate our notion of current thread.  */
       record_currthread (rs, minus_one_ptid);
       /* It's possible that the packet did not include a pid.  */
       if (event_ptid == null_ptid)
	event_ptid = first_remote_resumed_thread (this);
       /* EVENT_PTID could still be NULL_PTID.  Double-check.  */
       if (event_ptid == null_ptid)
	event_ptid = magic_null_ptid;
     } 

I'm attaching these as a patch in case one wants to test.  It should be applied
after the main multi-target patch.

Regards,
-Baris


> gdb/ChangeLog:
> yyyy-mm-dd  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* remote.c (first_remote_resumed_thread): New.
> 	(remote_target::wait_as): Use it as default event_ptid instead of
> 	inferior_ptid.
> ---
>  gdb/remote.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
> index bed861c65d..eacaf11976 100644
> --- a/gdb/remote.c
> +++ b/gdb/remote.c
> @@ -7703,6 +7703,17 @@ remote_target::wait_ns (ptid_t ptid, struct target_waitstatus *status, int optio
>      }
>  }
> 
> +/* Return the first resumed thread.  */
> +
> +static ptid_t
> +first_remote_resumed_thread ()
> +{
> +  for (thread_info *tp : all_non_exited_threads (minus_one_ptid))
> +    if (tp->resumed)
> +      return tp->ptid;
> +  return null_ptid;
> +}
> +
>  /* Wait until the remote machine stops, then return, storing status in
>     STATUS just as `wait' would.  */
> 
> @@ -7839,7 +7850,7 @@ remote_target::wait_as (ptid_t ptid, target_waitstatus *status, int options)
>        if (event_ptid != null_ptid)
>  	record_currthread (rs, event_ptid);
>        else
> -	event_ptid = inferior_ptid;
> +	event_ptid = first_remote_resumed_thread ();
>      }
>    else
>      /* A process exit.  Invalidate our notion of current thread.  */
> --
> 2.14.5

Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Gary Kershaw
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928

[-- Attachment #2: remote_event_ptid.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1763 bytes --]

diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
index ff75204ee8..d036dcf9cf 100644
--- a/gdb/remote.c
+++ b/gdb/remote.c
@@ -7919,8 +7919,16 @@ remote_target::wait_as (ptid_t ptid, target_waitstatus *status, int options)
 	event_ptid = first_remote_resumed_thread (this);
     }
   else
-    /* A process exit.  Invalidate our notion of current thread.  */
-    record_currthread (rs, minus_one_ptid);
+    {
+      /* A process exit.  Invalidate our notion of current thread.  */
+      record_currthread (rs, minus_one_ptid);
+      /* It's possible that the packet did not include a pid.  */
+      if (event_ptid == null_ptid)
+	event_ptid = first_remote_resumed_thread (this);
+      /* EVENT_PTID could still be NULL_PTID.  Double-check.  */
+      if (event_ptid == null_ptid)
+	event_ptid = magic_null_ptid;
+    }
 
   return event_ptid;
 }
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/connect-without-multi-process.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/connect-without-multi-process.exp
index fba20a6a0b..36b42207e2 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/connect-without-multi-process.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/connect-without-multi-process.exp
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 # along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
 
 # Check that we can connect to GDBserver with the multiprocess
-# extensions disabled, and run to main.
+# extensions disabled, run to main, and finish the process.
 
 load_lib gdbserver-support.exp
 
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ proc do_test {multiprocess} {
 	"target $gdbserver_protocol"
 
     gdb_test "continue" "main .*" "continue to main"
+
+    # Also test the termination because the 'W' packet differs
+    gdb_test "continue" ".* exited normally.*" "continue to termination"
 }
 
 foreach multiprocess { "off" "auto" } {

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-06 23:28 [PATCH 00/23] Multi-target support Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 09/23] switch inferior/thread before calling target methods Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 06/23] Don't check target is running in remote_target::mourn_inferior Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 20/23] Revert 'Remove unused struct serial::name field' Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:47   ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-08 19:30     ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 03/23] Make "show remote exec-file" inferior-aware Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 16/23] Fix reconnecting to a gdbserver already debugging multiple processes, II Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 19/23] gdbarch-selftests.c: No longer error out if debugging something Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 17/23] Multi-target support Pedro Alves
2019-09-11 17:11   ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-17  1:54     ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 18/23] Add multi-target tests Pedro Alves
2019-10-09 16:01   ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-10-17  0:55     ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 08/23] Introduce switch_to_inferior_no_thread Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 18:42   ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-17  1:07     ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 11/23] tfile_target::close: trace_fd can't be -1 Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 02/23] Don't rely on inferior_ptid in record_full_wait Pedro Alves
2020-07-31  3:17   ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-01 16:14     ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-01 19:32       ` John Baldwin
2020-08-01 20:47         ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-01 20:46       ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-01 22:56         ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-02 17:52           ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-03  0:08             ` Simon Marchi
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 13/23] Delete exit_inferior_silent(int pid) Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 10/23] Some get_last_target_status tweaks Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 18:53   ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-17  1:14     ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 01/23] Preserve selected thread in all-stop w/ background execution Pedro Alves
2019-10-09  9:36   ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-10-16 23:54     ` [PATCH v1.1 " Pedro Alves
2019-10-17 10:21       ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 15/23] Fix reconnecting to a gdbserver already debugging multiple processes, I Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:33 ` [PATCH 23/23] Multi-target: NEWS and user manual Pedro Alves
2019-09-07  6:33   ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17  2:08     ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-17  7:55       ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17  2:42     ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-17  8:14       ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 15:31         ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:34 ` [PATCH 04/23] exceptions.c:print_flush: Remove obsolete check Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 18:07   ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-06 23:35 ` [PATCH 05/23] Make target_ops::has_execution take an 'inferior *' instead of a ptid_t Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 18:12   ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-06 23:36 ` [PATCH 07/23] Delete unnecessary code from kill_command Pedro Alves
2019-10-01 10:19   ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-10-01 13:28     ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-09-06 23:36 ` [PATCH 14/23] Tweak handling of remote errors in response to resumption packet Pedro Alves
2019-10-09 13:35   ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris [this message]
2019-10-17  0:54     ` [PATCH 14.5/23] Avoid another inferior_ptid reference in gdb/remote.c (Re: [PATCH 14/23] Tweak handling of remote errors in response to resumption packet) Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:36 ` [PATCH 12/23] Use all_non_exited_inferiors in infrun.c Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:37 ` [PATCH 21/23] Add "info connections" command, "info inferiors" connection number/string Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 20:18   ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-17  2:21     ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-17 14:23       ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-06 23:37 ` [PATCH 22/23] Require always-non-stop for multi-target resumptions Pedro Alves
2019-09-07 11:19 ` [PATCH 00/23] Multi-target support Philippe Waroquiers
2019-09-08 20:06   ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-08 20:50     ` Philippe Waroquiers
2019-10-16 19:08       ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-16 19:14       ` [PATCH] Avoid inferior_ptid reference in gdb/remote.c (Re: [PATCH 00/23] Multi-target support) Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 19:09 ` [PATCH 00/23] Multi-target support Tom Tromey
2019-09-09 20:22 ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=B98F7326B8E238409968F562D326E1A90D07674D@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox