From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 14/23] Tweak handling of remote errors in response to resumption packet
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 23:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190906232807.6191-15-palves@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190906232807.6191-1-palves@redhat.com>
With current master, on a Fedora 27 machine with a kernel with buggy
watchpoint support, I see:
(gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: parent: singlethreaded: hardware breakpoints work
continue
Continuing.
warning: Remote failure reply: E01
Remote communication error. Target disconnected.: Connection reset by peer.
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: parent: singlethreaded: watchpoints work
continue
The program is not being run.
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: parent: singlethreaded: breakpoint after the first fork (the program is no longer running)
The FAILs themselves aren't what's interesting here. What is
interesting is that with the main multi-target patch applied, I was getting this:
(gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: parent: singlethreaded: hardware breakpoints work
continue
Continuing.
warning: Remote failure reply: E01
/home/pedro/brno/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb-2/build/../src/gdb/inferior.c:285: internal-error: inferior* find_inferior_pid(process_stratum_target*, int): Assertion `pid != 0' failed.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging may prove unreliable.
Quit this debugging session? (y or n) FAIL: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: parent: singlethreaded: watchpoints work (GDB internal error)
The problem is that in remote_target::wait_as, we're hitting this:
switch (buf[0])
{
case 'E': /* Error of some sort. */
/* We're out of sync with the target now. Did it continue or
not? Not is more likely, so report a stop. */
rs->waiting_for_stop_reply = 0;
warning (_("Remote failure reply: %s"), buf);
status->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED;
status->value.sig = GDB_SIGNAL_0;
break;
which leaves event_ptid as null_ptid. At the end of the function, we then reach:
else if (status->kind != TARGET_WAITKIND_EXITED
&& status->kind != TARGET_WAITKIND_SIGNALLED)
{
if (event_ptid != null_ptid)
record_currthread (rs, event_ptid);
else
event_ptid = inferior_ptid; <<<<< here
}
and the trouble is that with the multi-target patch, we'll get here
with inferior_ptid as null_ptid too. That is done exactly to find
these implicit assumptions that inferior_ptid is a good choice for
default thread, which isn't generaly true.
I first thought of fixing this in the "case 'E'" path, but, given that
this "event_ptid = inferior_ptid" path is also taken when the remote
target does not support threads at all, no thread-related packets or
extensions, it's better to fix it in latter path, to handle all
scenarios that miss reporting a thread.
That's what this patch does.
gdb/ChangeLog:
yyyy-mm-dd Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* remote.c (first_remote_resumed_thread): New.
(remote_target::wait_as): Use it as default event_ptid instead of
inferior_ptid.
---
gdb/remote.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
index bed861c65d..eacaf11976 100644
--- a/gdb/remote.c
+++ b/gdb/remote.c
@@ -7703,6 +7703,17 @@ remote_target::wait_ns (ptid_t ptid, struct target_waitstatus *status, int optio
}
}
+/* Return the first resumed thread. */
+
+static ptid_t
+first_remote_resumed_thread ()
+{
+ for (thread_info *tp : all_non_exited_threads (minus_one_ptid))
+ if (tp->resumed)
+ return tp->ptid;
+ return null_ptid;
+}
+
/* Wait until the remote machine stops, then return, storing status in
STATUS just as `wait' would. */
@@ -7839,7 +7850,7 @@ remote_target::wait_as (ptid_t ptid, target_waitstatus *status, int options)
if (event_ptid != null_ptid)
record_currthread (rs, event_ptid);
else
- event_ptid = inferior_ptid;
+ event_ptid = first_remote_resumed_thread ();
}
else
/* A process exit. Invalidate our notion of current thread. */
--
2.14.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-06 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-06 23:28 [PATCH 00/23] Multi-target support Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 01/23] Preserve selected thread in all-stop w/ background execution Pedro Alves
2019-10-09 9:36 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-10-16 23:54 ` [PATCH v1.1 " Pedro Alves
2019-10-17 10:21 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 10/23] Some get_last_target_status tweaks Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 18:53 ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-17 1:14 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 15/23] Fix reconnecting to a gdbserver already debugging multiple processes, I Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 13/23] Delete exit_inferior_silent(int pid) Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 02/23] Don't rely on inferior_ptid in record_full_wait Pedro Alves
2020-07-31 3:17 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-01 16:14 ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-01 19:32 ` John Baldwin
2020-08-01 20:47 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-01 20:46 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-01 22:56 ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-02 17:52 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-03 0:08 ` Simon Marchi
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 17/23] Multi-target support Pedro Alves
2019-09-11 17:11 ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-17 1:54 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 11/23] tfile_target::close: trace_fd can't be -1 Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 08/23] Introduce switch_to_inferior_no_thread Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 18:42 ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-17 1:07 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 18/23] Add multi-target tests Pedro Alves
2019-10-09 16:01 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-10-17 0:55 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 09/23] switch inferior/thread before calling target methods Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 16/23] Fix reconnecting to a gdbserver already debugging multiple processes, II Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 03/23] Make "show remote exec-file" inferior-aware Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 19/23] gdbarch-selftests.c: No longer error out if debugging something Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 20/23] Revert 'Remove unused struct serial::name field' Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:47 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-08 19:30 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 06/23] Don't check target is running in remote_target::mourn_inferior Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:33 ` [PATCH 23/23] Multi-target: NEWS and user manual Pedro Alves
2019-09-07 6:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 2:08 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-17 7:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 2:42 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-17 8:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 15:31 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:34 ` [PATCH 04/23] exceptions.c:print_flush: Remove obsolete check Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 18:07 ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-06 23:35 ` [PATCH 05/23] Make target_ops::has_execution take an 'inferior *' instead of a ptid_t Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 18:12 ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-06 23:36 ` [PATCH 12/23] Use all_non_exited_inferiors in infrun.c Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:36 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2019-10-09 13:35 ` [PATCH 14/23] Tweak handling of remote errors in response to resumption packet Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-10-17 0:54 ` [PATCH 14.5/23] Avoid another inferior_ptid reference in gdb/remote.c (Re: [PATCH 14/23] Tweak handling of remote errors in response to resumption packet) Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:36 ` [PATCH 07/23] Delete unnecessary code from kill_command Pedro Alves
2019-10-01 10:19 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-10-01 13:28 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-09-06 23:37 ` [PATCH 22/23] Require always-non-stop for multi-target resumptions Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:37 ` [PATCH 21/23] Add "info connections" command, "info inferiors" connection number/string Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 20:18 ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-17 2:21 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-17 14:23 ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-07 11:19 ` [PATCH 00/23] Multi-target support Philippe Waroquiers
2019-09-08 20:06 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-08 20:50 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2019-10-16 19:08 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-16 19:14 ` [PATCH] Avoid inferior_ptid reference in gdb/remote.c (Re: [PATCH 00/23] Multi-target support) Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 19:09 ` [PATCH 00/23] Multi-target support Tom Tromey
2019-09-09 20:22 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190906232807.6191-15-palves@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox