From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 15/23] Fix reconnecting to a gdbserver already debugging multiple processes, I
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 23:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190906232807.6191-16-palves@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190906232807.6191-1-palves@redhat.com>
The multi-target patch will change the remote target's behavior when:
- the current inferior is connected to an extended-remote target.
- the current inferior is attached to any process.
- some other inferior than than the current one is live.
In current master, we get:
(gdb) tar extended-remote :9999
A program is being debugged already. Kill it? (y or n)
While after multi-target, since each inferior may have its own target
connection, we'll get:
(gdb) tar extended-remote :9999
Already connected to a remote target. Disconnect? (y or n)
That change made gdb.server/extended-remote-restart.exp expose a gdb
bug, because it made "target remote", via gdb_reconnect, just
disconnect from the previous connection, while in current master that
command would kill the inferior before disconnecting. In turn, that
would make a multi-target gdb find processes already running under
control of gdbserver as soon as it reconnects, while in current master
there is never any process around when gdb reconnects, since they'd
all been killed prior to disconnection.
The bug this exposed is that remote_target::remote_add_inferior was
always reusing current_inferior() for the new process, even if the
current inferior was already bound to a process. In the testcase's
case, when we reconnect, the remote is debugging two processes. So
we'd bind the first remote process to the empty current inferior the
first time, and then bind the second remote process to the same
inferior again, essencially losing track of the first process. That
resulted in failed assertions when we look up the inferior for the
first process by PID. The fix is to still prefer binding to the
current inferior (so that plain "target remote" keeps doing what you'd
expect), but not reuse the current inferior if it is already bound to
a process.
This patch tweaks the test to explicitly disconnect before
reconnecting, to avoid GDB killing processes, thus making current GDB
behave the same as it will behave when the multi-target work lands.
That change alone without the GDB fix exposes the bug like so:
(gdb) PASS: gdb.server/extended-remote-restart.exp: kill: 0, follow-child 0: disconnect
target extended-remote localhost:2350
Remote debugging using localhost:2350
src/gdb/thread.c:93: internal-error: thread_info* inferior_thread(): Assertion `tp' failed.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging may prove unreliable.
Quit this debugging session? (y or n)
The original bug that the testcase was written for was related to
killing, (git 9d4a934ce604 ("gdb: Fix assert for extended-remote
target (PR gdb/18050)")), but since the testcase tries reconnecting
with both explicitly killing and not explicitly killing, I think we're
covering the original bug with this testcase change.
gdb/ChangeLog:
yyyy-mm-dd Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* remote.c (remote_target::remote_add_inferior): Don't bind a
process to the current inferior if the current inferior is already
bound to a process.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
yyyy-mm-dd Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* gdb.server/extended-remote-restart.exp (test_reload): Explicitly
disconnect before reconnecting.
---
gdb/remote.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/extended-remote-restart.exp | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
index eacaf11976..16ef9dbdfd 100644
--- a/gdb/remote.c
+++ b/gdb/remote.c
@@ -2371,6 +2371,26 @@ remote_target::remote_add_inferior (bool fake_pid_p, int pid, int attached,
between program/address spaces. We simply bind the inferior
to the program space's address space. */
inf = current_inferior ();
+
+ /* However, if the current inferior is already bound to a
+ process, find some other empty inferior. */
+ if (inf->pid != 0)
+ {
+ inf = nullptr;
+ for (inferior *it : all_inferiors ())
+ if (it->pid == 0)
+ {
+ inf = it;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (inf == nullptr)
+ {
+ /* Since all inferiors were already bound to a process, add
+ a new inferior. */
+ inf = add_inferior_with_spaces ();
+ }
+ switch_to_inferior_no_thread (inf);
inferior_appeared (inf, pid);
}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/extended-remote-restart.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/extended-remote-restart.exp
index 1fa46f2073..c78342c010 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/extended-remote-restart.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/extended-remote-restart.exp
@@ -113,7 +113,9 @@ proc test_reload { do_kill_p follow_child_p } {
"Check inferior was killed"
}
- # Reconnect to the target.
+ # Disconnect, and reconnect to the target.
+ gdb_test "disconnect" ".*"
+
if { [gdb_reconnect] == 0 } {
pass "reconnect after fork"
} else {
--
2.14.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-06 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-06 23:28 [PATCH 00/23] Multi-target support Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 10/23] Some get_last_target_status tweaks Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 18:53 ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-17 1:14 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 01/23] Preserve selected thread in all-stop w/ background execution Pedro Alves
2019-10-09 9:36 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-10-16 23:54 ` [PATCH v1.1 " Pedro Alves
2019-10-17 10:21 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 02/23] Don't rely on inferior_ptid in record_full_wait Pedro Alves
2020-07-31 3:17 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-01 16:14 ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-01 19:32 ` John Baldwin
2020-08-01 20:47 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-01 20:46 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-01 22:56 ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-02 17:52 ` Tom Tromey
2020-08-03 0:08 ` Simon Marchi
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 13/23] Delete exit_inferior_silent(int pid) Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 18/23] Add multi-target tests Pedro Alves
2019-10-09 16:01 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-10-17 0:55 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 11/23] tfile_target::close: trace_fd can't be -1 Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 08/23] Introduce switch_to_inferior_no_thread Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 18:42 ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-17 1:07 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 17/23] Multi-target support Pedro Alves
2019-09-11 17:11 ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-17 1:54 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 06/23] Don't check target is running in remote_target::mourn_inferior Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 20/23] Revert 'Remove unused struct serial::name field' Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:47 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-09-08 19:30 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 03/23] Make "show remote exec-file" inferior-aware Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 16/23] Fix reconnecting to a gdbserver already debugging multiple processes, II Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 19/23] gdbarch-selftests.c: No longer error out if debugging something Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:28 ` [PATCH 09/23] switch inferior/thread before calling target methods Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:33 ` [PATCH 23/23] Multi-target: NEWS and user manual Pedro Alves
2019-09-07 6:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 2:08 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-17 7:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 2:42 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-17 8:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 15:31 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:34 ` [PATCH 04/23] exceptions.c:print_flush: Remove obsolete check Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 18:07 ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-06 23:35 ` [PATCH 05/23] Make target_ops::has_execution take an 'inferior *' instead of a ptid_t Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 18:12 ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-06 23:36 ` [PATCH 12/23] Use all_non_exited_inferiors in infrun.c Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:36 ` [PATCH 14/23] Tweak handling of remote errors in response to resumption packet Pedro Alves
2019-10-09 13:35 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-10-17 0:54 ` [PATCH 14.5/23] Avoid another inferior_ptid reference in gdb/remote.c (Re: [PATCH 14/23] Tweak handling of remote errors in response to resumption packet) Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:36 ` [PATCH 07/23] Delete unnecessary code from kill_command Pedro Alves
2019-10-01 10:19 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-10-01 13:28 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2019-09-06 23:37 ` [PATCH 22/23] Require always-non-stop for multi-target resumptions Pedro Alves
2019-09-06 23:37 ` [PATCH 21/23] Add "info connections" command, "info inferiors" connection number/string Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 20:18 ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-17 2:21 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-17 14:23 ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-07 11:19 ` [PATCH 00/23] Multi-target support Philippe Waroquiers
2019-09-08 20:06 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-08 20:50 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2019-10-16 19:08 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-16 19:14 ` [PATCH] Avoid inferior_ptid reference in gdb/remote.c (Re: [PATCH 00/23] Multi-target support) Pedro Alves
2019-09-09 19:09 ` [PATCH 00/23] Multi-target support Tom Tromey
2019-09-09 20:22 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190906232807.6191-16-palves@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox