Re: GDB 9.1 release: Start of stabilization period ?

[Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>]

On 13-10-2019 03:18, Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches wrote:
> HI Joel,
> 
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 3:19 PM Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Now that the 8.3.1 release is out, I think now is a good time to
>> prepare the 9.1 release. I looked at the gdb/NEWS file and it is
>> chockablock full of goodies!
>>
>> At the moment, there aren't any issues in bugzilla that are marked
>> pending for GDB 9.1.
>>
>> Are there any issues that people would like to be fixed, before
>> we release GDB 9.1? For those issues, it would be good to see whether
>> these are blocking issues prior to branching, or not.
>>
>> In the meantime, while we start collecting the list of issues
>> we want to fix for 9.1, if there aren't any objection, I'd like us
>> to start a cooling period so as to stabilize GDB prior to branching.
> 
> I'm not that familiar with the gdb release process,

Likewise.

Here's my wishlist:
- [gdb/tdep] Fix 'Unexpected register class' assert in
  amd64_push_arguments
  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-10/msg00293.html
- [gdb/tdep] Fix inferior call arg passing for amd64
  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-10/msg00307.html
- [gdb] Only force INTERP_CONSOLE ui_out for breakpoint commands in MI
  mode
  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-10/msg00099.html
- [gdb/symtab] Prefer var def over decl
  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-09/msg00161.html

Thanks,
- Tom