* Re: 5.1.1
[not found] <3C2063B5.8090805@cygnus.com>
@ 2001-12-19 2:51 ` Pierre Muller
2001-12-19 7:44 ` 5.1.1 Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pierre Muller @ 2001-12-19 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
At 10:53 19/12/2001 , vous avez écrit:
>I suspect that there are enough things now to justify a 5.1.1. Can I suggest spinning it out sometime mid summer (January for the geographicaly impaired :-)
I can only speak about the issues that concerns me directly...
But the i386 hardware watchpoint bugs are still not fixed...
would this be an important point ?
What about the hardware watchpoint for cygwin ?
I thought that this would also be interesting for 5.1.1 ...
Pierre Muller
Institut Charles Sadron
6,rue Boussingault
F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France)
mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr
Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07 Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.1.1
2001-12-19 2:51 ` 5.1.1 Pierre Muller
@ 2001-12-19 7:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-12-19 11:56 ` 5.1.1 Elena Zannoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2001-12-19 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: muller; +Cc: ac131313, gdb-patches
> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:49:46 +0100
> From: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
>
> But the i386 hardware watchpoint bugs are still not fixed...
> would this be an important point ?
>
> What about the hardware watchpoint for cygwin ?
> I thought that this would also be interesting for 5.1.1 ...
IMHO, yes and yes. But I didn't hear anything from Michael Snyder
yet, and I cannot currently afford working on something without a
go-ahead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 5.1.1
2001-12-19 7:44 ` 5.1.1 Eli Zaretskii
@ 2001-12-19 11:56 ` Elena Zannoni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Elena Zannoni @ 2001-12-19 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: muller, ac131313, gdb-patches
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:49:46 +0100
> > From: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
> >
> > But the i386 hardware watchpoint bugs are still not fixed...
> > would this be an important point ?
> >
> > What about the hardware watchpoint for cygwin ?
> > I thought that this would also be interesting for 5.1.1 ...
>
> IMHO, yes and yes. But I didn't hear anything from Michael Snyder
> yet, and I cannot currently afford working on something without a
> go-ahead.
How about this arm patch I am going to commit? Would it be worthwhile
committing it to 5.1.1?
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-11/msg00396.html
Elena
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-19 19:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <3C2063B5.8090805@cygnus.com>
2001-12-19 2:51 ` 5.1.1 Pierre Muller
2001-12-19 7:44 ` 5.1.1 Eli Zaretskii
2001-12-19 11:56 ` 5.1.1 Elena Zannoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox