From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19408 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2001 15:44:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19114 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2001 15:44:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO heimdall.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2001 15:44:53 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([192.116.55.139]) by heimdall.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BCM61672; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 17:44:24 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 07:44:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr Message-Id: <9743-Wed19Dec2001174233+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4.2.0.58.20011219114701.01a057e8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> (message from Pierre Muller on Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:49:46 +0100) Subject: Re: 5.1.1 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4.2.0.58.20011219114701.01a057e8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00461.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:49:46 +0100 > From: Pierre Muller > > But the i386 hardware watchpoint bugs are still not fixed... > would this be an important point ? > > What about the hardware watchpoint for cygwin ? > I thought that this would also be interesting for 5.1.1 ... IMHO, yes and yes. But I didn't hear anything from Michael Snyder yet, and I cannot currently afford working on something without a go-ahead.