From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>,
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] Remove "readnow" support
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 14:39:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <945d83fc-5518-4e04-8fe8-ebcca0acf0bd@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h5rmay3z.fsf@redhat.com>
On 2/12/26 8:29 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 11:49:09 -0700
>>> Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
>>>
>>> I think the "readnow" feature should be removed.
>>>
>>> "readnow" exists basically to work around potential bugs in any
>>> "partial" reader. This used to work ok because gdb would scan all the
>>> expanded symtabs in addition to using the "quick" functions. This
>>> changed with the "search via psyms" series.
>>>
>>> So now, "readnow" is basically its own separate implementation. As
>>> such, I don't think it carries its weight. It is very slow and uses a
>>> lot of memory, and can have its own bugs requiring extra work on our
>>> part.
>>
>> Is there any other way for the user to force GDB to read all of the
>> symbols from all of the object files? If not, perhaps this
>> functionality still has its value? Maybe we should make it a "maint"
>> command instead?
>
> I second this. We do run into bugs with the indexes from time to time,
> and it's good to have some way to tell GDB to go read the full debug
> information so we can narrow the bug down. Plus it offers a work around
> in these cases.
>
> Is 'maint expand-symtabs' the equivalent? When someone uses -readnow
> should we maybe guide them towards the new way of doing things, even all
> we do is point towards a particular entry in the manual maybe?
From what I understand, "maint expand-symtabs" is not an exact
replacement for readnow. With the recent changes that Tom Tromey did
(always search via the "quick" functions), this is how it works when
searching for a symbol:
- the code invokes the quick_symbol_functions::search method
(cooked_index_functions::search for the DWARF index).
- if a compunit_symtab looks like it could contain said symbol, the
quick functions' search method calls a callback, passing the
compunit_symtab, and the core searches it
- if you "maint expand-symtabs" first, the search still goes through
cooked_index_functions::search. So if there is a bug in
cooked_index_functions::search, it won't bypass it. In other words,
which symtabs are currently expanded should not affect a search (this
was the point of the change, that was a source of bugs)
With readnow, the cooked index is not built. Instead, compunit_symtab
are built from the start, and readnow_functions is used instead of
cooked_index_functions. readnow_functions::search goes over the
all_units vector and searches all of them (I wonder if it could use
expanded_symbols_functions instead...). If there was a bug in
cooked_index_functions::search, then this would by pass it.
I don't know if it's really worth having a completely parallel code path
just in case there is a bug in the main path. That parallel code path
is a source of headaches of its own. That being said, if we could indeed
use expanded_symbols_functions, then keeping readnow wouldn't represent
much code I think.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-12 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-11 18:49 [PATCH RFC 0/2] Remove -readnow Tom Tromey
2026-02-11 18:49 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] Remove "readnow" support Tom Tromey
2026-02-12 7:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2026-02-12 13:29 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-02-12 16:44 ` Kevin Buettner
2026-02-12 19:39 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2026-02-14 21:26 ` Tom Tromey
2026-02-11 18:49 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] Remove quick_symbol_functions::expand_all_symtabs Tom Tromey
2026-02-12 21:32 [PATCH RFC 1/2] Remove "readnow" support Jan Vrany
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=945d83fc-5518-4e04-8fe8-ebcca0acf0bd@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox