Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] Remove "readnow" support

Tom Tromey
2026-02-14T21:27:01Z

Simon> I don't know if it's really worth having a completely parallel code path
Simon> just in case there is a bug in the main path. That parallel code path
Simon> is a source of headaches of its own. That being said, if we could indeed
Simon> use expanded_symbols_functions, then keeping readnow wouldn't represent
Simon> much code I think.

I have a patch for that, but in a way it was the motivation to delete
readnow.

Tom