From: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
To: NZG <ngustavson@emacinc.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Subject: Re: frame theory, was pointer madness
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 23:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f2776cb0601261539x3c547df9p3c81651bd967b068@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0601261516l51b150c3u8720b2816f7b624a@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/26/06, Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com> wrote:
> this paragraph, and 2) Daniel got it backwards too when he said:
>
> >The innermost frame is always #0; it is the first frame "unwound"
> >from the sentinel frame. Then the next frame is unwound from frame 0.
>
> He should have said "the PREVIOUS frame is unwound from frame 0".
Or, as Jason has pointed out to me, probably Daniel meant "the next
frame" in the sense of "the next frame to be constructed", which is
perfectly correct. But I do think it's ambiguous.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-26 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-23 20:39 gdb code review, " NZG
2006-01-23 20:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-23 20:51 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 17:19 ` NZG
2006-01-24 19:29 ` NZG
2006-01-24 21:27 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 21:58 ` NZG
2006-01-24 22:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-25 0:01 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-25 4:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-25 4:59 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-25 5:25 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-25 17:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-25 18:49 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-25 19:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-25 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-26 16:19 ` NZG
2006-01-26 16:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 19:55 ` frame theory, was " NZG
2006-01-26 19:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 20:17 ` NZG
2006-01-26 20:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 21:21 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-01-26 21:54 ` NZG
2006-01-26 22:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-01-26 22:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 23:27 ` remote connection crash, was frame theory NZG
2006-01-26 23:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 23:42 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-26 23:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 23:57 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-27 0:04 ` NZG
2006-01-30 17:02 ` 5282 gdb Eclipse MI support, was remote connection crash NZG
2006-01-26 23:47 ` frame theory, was pointer madness Accounts
2006-01-26 23:16 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-26 23:39 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2006-01-27 7:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f2776cb0601261539x3c547df9p3c81651bd967b068@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jimb@red-bean.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=ngustavson@emacinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox