From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: NZG <ngustavson@emacinc.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
Subject: Re: frame theory, was pointer madness
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060126202218.GA16063@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200601261415.41732.ngustavson@emacinc.com>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 02:15:41PM -0600, NZG wrote:
> On Thursday 26 January 2006 1:59 pm, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > It's important to use consistent terminology when talking about this.
> > What do you mean by "highest"?
> Largest integer number in the frames "level" element.
>
> > It's important to use consistent terminology
> I agree, but it's been somewhat difficult to unravel the terminology so far.
> There doesn't really seem to be any master document defining it.
> I'm an EE, so if this is standard CS jargon please forgive me.
>
> inner refers to ->next
> and outer refers to prev<-
>
> The farther in, the younger your function call.
>
> Is this right?;
Yes, that's how we generally use the terms in GDB.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-26 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-23 20:39 gdb code review, " NZG
2006-01-23 20:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-23 20:51 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 17:19 ` NZG
2006-01-24 19:29 ` NZG
2006-01-24 21:27 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 21:58 ` NZG
2006-01-24 22:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-25 0:01 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-25 4:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-25 4:59 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-25 5:25 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-25 17:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-25 18:49 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-25 19:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-25 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-26 16:19 ` NZG
2006-01-26 16:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 19:55 ` frame theory, was " NZG
2006-01-26 19:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 20:17 ` NZG
2006-01-26 20:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-01-26 21:21 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-01-26 21:54 ` NZG
2006-01-26 22:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-01-26 22:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 23:27 ` remote connection crash, was frame theory NZG
2006-01-26 23:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 23:42 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-26 23:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 23:57 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-27 0:04 ` NZG
2006-01-30 17:02 ` 5282 gdb Eclipse MI support, was remote connection crash NZG
2006-01-26 23:47 ` frame theory, was pointer madness Accounts
2006-01-26 23:16 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-26 23:39 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-27 7:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060126202218.GA16063@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jimb@red-bean.com \
--cc=ngustavson@emacinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox