From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: ngustavson@emacinc.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: frame theory, was pointer madness
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601262121.k0QLLGfw017308@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200601261354.12256.ngustavson@emacinc.com> (message from NZG on Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:54:12 -0600)
> From: NZG <ngustavson@emacinc.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:54:12 -0600
>
> Lets see if I have this right.
> Assuming a linked list with 5 frames, they should look like this
>
> level description
> -1 sentinal frame(virtual)
> 0 youngest frame (the deepest function call and current frame)
> 1 older
> 2 even older
> 3 oldest
>
> And the list should look like this
>
> prev->frame->next
>
> NULL->3->2->1->0->-1->-1->-1........
I get the feeling that you've got a wrong picture. I'd view things
as:
-1 -> 0 -> 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> NULL
> I think, and I have yet to successfully verify this, that the highest level
> frame should have an id of zero, or at least should.
>
> Normal gdb appears to work by caching the frame of the highest level
> to a NULL prev value, which appears to be happening somewhere when
> the frame first enters existance. In the case of a gdbremote
> connection this should be on connection to the remote server. When
> frame 0 is the highest and lowest real level it will "unwind" frame
> zero by accessing -1. which should in turn actually read the
> registers from remote device. Then ->black magic - black magic ->
> gdb realizes there is no higher level frame and caches a NULL there.
Sorry but what you say here doesn't make any sense to me. GDB unwinds
the stack from the registers values that are currently found in the
cpu. Unwinding involves interpreting debug info or analyzing code to
determine where the register values for the previous frames are
stored. This process can terminate (i.e. if we hit main, or if the
value for the frame pointer register for a frame is zero[1]) but isn't
guaranteed to. Actually the unwinding process is difficult to get
completely right, and might send us off into the wrong direction,
resulting in rubish frames.
I'm not sure what your problem is, only that GDB seems to work pretty
well on OpenBSD/mac68k, so I doubt there is a fundamental problem in
the generic m68k unwinder code.
Mark
[1] If the ISA/ABI has a "hard" frame pointer register
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-26 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-23 20:39 gdb code review, " NZG
2006-01-23 20:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-23 20:51 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 17:19 ` NZG
2006-01-24 19:29 ` NZG
2006-01-24 21:27 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-24 21:58 ` NZG
2006-01-24 22:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-25 0:01 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-25 4:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-25 4:59 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-25 5:25 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-25 17:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-25 18:49 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-25 19:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-25 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-26 16:19 ` NZG
2006-01-26 16:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 19:55 ` frame theory, was " NZG
2006-01-26 19:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 20:17 ` NZG
2006-01-26 20:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 21:21 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2006-01-26 21:54 ` NZG
2006-01-26 22:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-01-26 22:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 23:27 ` remote connection crash, was frame theory NZG
2006-01-26 23:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 23:42 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-26 23:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-26 23:57 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-27 0:04 ` NZG
2006-01-30 17:02 ` 5282 gdb Eclipse MI support, was remote connection crash NZG
2006-01-26 23:47 ` frame theory, was pointer madness Accounts
2006-01-26 23:16 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-26 23:39 ` Jim Blandy
2006-01-27 7:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200601262121.k0QLLGfw017308@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=ngustavson@emacinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox