* Forgotten patch? @ 2006-01-20 22:08 Jim Blandy 2006-01-20 22:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Jim Blandy @ 2006-01-20 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: GDB Patches The following patch fixes gdb/1903, but it seems to have gotten lost; could our new patch champions add it to their records? http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-04/msg00066.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Forgotten patch? 2006-01-20 22:08 Forgotten patch? Jim Blandy @ 2006-01-20 22:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2006-01-20 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jim Blandy; +Cc: GDB Patches On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:08:51PM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote: > The following patch fixes gdb/1903, but it seems to have gotten lost; > could our new patch champions add it to their records? > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-04/msg00066.html I haven't forgotten about this patch - in fact, I've got a queue of followups that need to be dusted off and updated, to support the debug output generated by ARM's compilers. I'll be looking into this one again after the dust from the maintainer pings has settled. Thanks for the reminder. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-20 22:42 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-01-20 22:08 Forgotten patch? Jim Blandy 2006-01-20 22:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox