* Forgotten patch?
@ 2006-01-20 22:08 Jim Blandy
2006-01-20 22:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jim Blandy @ 2006-01-20 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GDB Patches
The following patch fixes gdb/1903, but it seems to have gotten lost;
could our new patch champions add it to their records?
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-04/msg00066.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Forgotten patch?
2006-01-20 22:08 Forgotten patch? Jim Blandy
@ 2006-01-20 22:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2006-01-20 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Blandy; +Cc: GDB Patches
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:08:51PM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> The following patch fixes gdb/1903, but it seems to have gotten lost;
> could our new patch champions add it to their records?
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-04/msg00066.html
I haven't forgotten about this patch - in fact, I've got a queue of
followups that need to be dusted off and updated, to support the debug
output generated by ARM's compilers. I'll be looking into this one
again after the dust from the maintainer pings has settled.
Thanks for the reminder.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-20 22:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-20 22:08 Forgotten patch? Jim Blandy
2006-01-20 22:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox