Re: [RFA] Patch for PR gdb/2477

["Paul Pluzhnikov" <ppluzhnikov@google.com>]

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:

> Ignoring the number entirely should preserve the intention of the test
> - we're interested in the "A *" and in there being no error message.
> "${hex}f"?

I didn't know about ${hex}.
Committed as below.

Thanks,

-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov

2008-07-15  Paul Pluzhnikov  <ppluzhnikov@google.com>

	* gdb.cp/class2.exp: fix for failure on spu-elf
	

Index: testsuite/gdb.cp/class2.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/class2.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -u -r1.7 class2.exp
--- testsuite/gdb.cp/class2.exp	14 Jul 2008 18:28:57 -0000	1.7
+++ testsuite/gdb.cp/class2.exp	15 Jul 2008 19:08:07 -0000
@@ -121,6 +121,6 @@ gdb_test "p e" "= \{<No data fields>\}"
 # Printing NULL pointers with "set print object on"

 gdb_test "set print object on" ""
-gdb_test "p acp" "= \\(C \\*\\) 0x\[a-f0-9\]+"
+gdb_test "p acp" "= \\(C \\*\\) ${hex}"
 gdb_test "p acp->c1" "\\(A \\*\\) 0x0"
-gdb_test "p acp->c2" "\\(A \\*\\) 0xf+"
+gdb_test "p acp->c2" "\\(A \\*\\) ${hex}f"