Re: [RFA] Darwin/x86 port (v2 - part 0)

[Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>]

On Nov 14, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I'd like to know whether there are any large sets of failed tests that
> have something in common (a.k.a. unsupported GDB features), before I
> make up my mind.

Sure.
I was using a wrong gdb (was work in progress).  New results are much  
better:

		=== gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes		10785
# of unexpected failures	653
# of expected failures		33
# of known failures		117
# of unresolved testcases	5
# of untested testcases		30
# of unsupported tests		59

There are a few obvious groups:
* unwinding through signals handlers doesn't work.
* shared libraries are not supported.  There are a few consequences:  
break printf doesn't work too.
* no core support
* no thread support
* call-sc doesn't work.

Tristan.