From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: brobecker@adacore.com
Cc: stan@codesourcery.com, gingold@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Darwin/x86 port (v2 - part 0)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811141552.mAEFqrnp019171@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081114154308.GG12802@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:43:08 -0800)
> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:43:08 -0800
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>
> (trying to take my AdaCore hat off)
>
> > My natural inclination is to accept the code into the trunk after review
> > - I suspect that the next round of changes will be more invasive into
> > the rest of GDB, and it would be easier to consider each of those
> > separately from the basic port. But, I have a track record of being too
> > optimistic on this strategy, ahem. :-) What do other people think?
>
> I think that's a good approach. In this case, it is even more attractive
> as the changes have remained uninvasive so far, so it would be easy to
> undo them all if we decided to do so. All in all, I think we have a lot
> to gain, and little to lose.
Just to be clear. I'm happy with the state the i386-specefic bits are
in, so if Stan's happy with the generic Darwin bits I have no
objections. Best to have this in the tree such that it is easier for
other people to work on.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-14 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-12 10:14 Tristan Gingold
2008-11-13 15:11 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-11-13 19:41 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-11-13 20:40 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-11-13 21:41 ` Stan Shebs
2008-11-14 16:28 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-11-14 16:41 ` Stan Shebs
2008-11-14 17:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-14 17:44 ` Tristan Gingold
2008-11-14 17:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-11-14 17:47 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2008-11-14 15:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811141552.mAEFqrnp019171@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=gingold@adacore.com \
--cc=stan@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox