From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27136 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2008 15:51:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 27097 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2008 15:51:12 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:50:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF398290006; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:50:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vocTKh4E2fHJ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:50:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBFC290001; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:50:33 +0100 (CET) Cc: Stan Shebs , Mark Kettenis Message-Id: <8C0C9EB8-A4C2-4C48-9A0E-8D79DF04AAF5@adacore.com> From: Tristan Gingold To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [RFA] Darwin/x86 port (v2 - part 0) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:44:00 -0000 References: <3A152A70-4355-440D-839F-A4EAC36C530B@adacore.com> <200811131452.mADEq21U018058@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <406742BB-4F37-406B-B4E3-75C8DD2DBD03@adacore.com> <491C6C09.4050300@codesourcery.com> <2C387CFB-1541-41B5-964C-68692E078BFA@adacore.com> <491D93D8.6060007@codesourcery.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00345.txt.bz2 On Nov 14, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I'd like to know whether there are any large sets of failed tests that > have something in common (a.k.a. unsupported GDB features), before I > make up my mind. Sure. I was using a wrong gdb (was work in progress). New results are much better: === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 10785 # of unexpected failures 653 # of expected failures 33 # of known failures 117 # of unresolved testcases 5 # of untested testcases 30 # of unsupported tests 59 There are a few obvious groups: * unwinding through signals handlers doesn't work. * shared libraries are not supported. There are a few consequences: break printf doesn't work too. * no core support * no thread support * call-sc doesn't work. Tristan.