From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdb/testsuite: track if a caching proc calls gdb_exit or not
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 10:16:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zfpovgkr.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97973506-79f4-4216-9c0b-57401b3933f5@arm.com>
Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> writes:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 6/3/24 19:16, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>> After a recent patch review I asked myself why can_spawn_for_attach
>> exists. This proc currently does some checks, and then calls
>> can_spawn_for_attach_1 which is an actual caching proc.
>>
>> The answer is that can_spawn_for_attach exists in order to call
>> gdb_exit the first time can_spawn_for_attach is called within any test
>> script.
>>
>> The reason this is useful is that can_spawn_for_attach_1 calls
>> gdb_exit. If imagine the user calling can_spawn_for_attach_1 directly
>> then a problem might exist. Imagine a test written like this:
>>
>> gdb_start
>>
>> if { [can_spawn_for_attach_1] } {
>> ... do stuff that assumes GDB is running ...
>> }
>>
>> If this test is NOT the first test run, and if an earlier test calls
>> can_spawn_for_attach_1, then when the above test is run the
>> can_spawn_for_attach_1 call will return the cached value and gdb_exit
>> will not be called.
>>
>> But, if the above test IS the first test run then
>> can_spawn_for_attach_1 will not returned the cached value, but will
>> instead compute the cached value, a process that ends up calling
>> gdb_exit. When the body of the if is executed GDB would no longer be
>> running and the test would fail!
>>
>> So can_spawn_for_attach was added which ensures that we _always_ call
>> gdb_exit the first time can_spawn_for_attach is called within a single
>> test script, this ensures that in the above case, even if the above is
>> not the first test run, gdb_exit will still be called. This avoids
>> some hidden bugs in the testsuite.
>>
>> However, what I observe is that can_spawn_for_attach is not the only
>> caching proc that calls gdb_exit. Why does can_spawn_for_attach get
>> special treatment when surely the same issue exists for any other
>> caching proc that calls gdb_exit?
>>
>> I think a better solution is to move the logic from
>> can_spawn_for_attach into cache.exp and generalise it so that it
>> applies to all caching procs.
>>
>> This commit does this by:
>>
>> 1. When the underlying caching proc is executed we wrap gdb_exit.
>> This wrapper sets a global to true if gdb_exit is called. The
>> value of this global is stored in gdb_data_cache (using a ',exit'
>> suffix), and also written to the cache file if appropriate.
>>
>> 2. When a cached value is returned from gdb_do_cache, if the
>> underlying proc would have called gdb_exit, and if this is the
>> first use of the caching proc in this test script, then we call
>> gdb_exit.
>>
>> When storing the ',exit' value into the on-disk cache file, the flag
>> value is stored on a second line. Currently every cached value only
>> occupies a single line, and a check is added to ensure this remains
>> true in the future.
>>
>> One issue did come up in testing, a FAIL in gdb.base/break-interp.exp,
>> this was caused by can_spawn_for_attach_1 calling gdb_start without
>> first calling gdb_exit. Under the old way of doing things
>> can_spawn_for_attach would call gdb_exit _before_ possibly calling the
>> actual caching proc. Under the new scheme gdb_exit is called _after_
>> calling the actual caching proc. What was happening was that
>> break-interp.exp would leave GDB running then call
>> can_spawn_for_attach, when the test in can_spawn_for_attach_1 tried to
>> attach to the inferior, state left in the running GDB would cause some
>> unexpected behaviour. Fixed by having can_spawn_for_attach_1 call
>> gdb_exit before calling gdb_start, this ensures we have a fresh GDB.
>>
>> With this done can_spawn_for_attach_1 can be renamed to
>> can_spawn_for_attach, and the existing can_spawn_for_attach can be
>> deleted.
>> ---
>> gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp | 83 +++++++++--------------------------
>> 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp
>> index e7b9114058b..fef065ec8b0 100644
>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp
>> @@ -46,6 +46,40 @@ proc gdb_do_cache_wrap {real_name args} {
>> return $result
>> }
>>
>> +# Global written to by wrap_gdb_exit. Set to true if wrap_gdb_exit is
>> +# called.
>> +
>> +set gdb_exit_called false
>> +
>> +# Wrapper around gdb_exit. Use with_override to replace gdb_exit with
>> +# wrap_gdb_exit, the original gdb_exit is renamed to orig_gdb_exit.
>> +
>> +proc wrap_gdb_exit {} {
>> + set ::gdb_exit_called true
>> + orig_gdb_exit
>> +}
>> +
>> +# If DO_EXIT is false then this proc does nothing. If DO_EXIT is true
>> +# then call gdb_exit the first time this proc is called for each
>> +# unique value of NAME within a single test. Every subsequent time
>> +# this proc is called within a single test (for a given value of
>> +# NAME), don't call gdb_exit.
>> +
>> +proc gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit { name do_exit } {
>> + if { !$do_exit } {
>> + return
>> + }
>> +
>> + # To track if this proc has been called for NAME we create a
>> + # global variable. In gdb_cleanup_globals (see gdb.exp) this
>> + # global will be deleted when the test has finished.
>> + set global_name __${name}__cached_gdb_exit_called
>> + if { ![info exists ::${global_name}] } {
>> + gdb_exit
>> + set ::${global_name} true
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> # A helper for gdb_caching_proc that handles the caching.
>>
>> proc gdb_do_cache {name args} {
>> @@ -71,10 +105,12 @@ proc gdb_do_cache {name args} {
>>
>> set is_cached 0
>> if {[info exists gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)]} {
>> - set cached $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>> - verbose "$name: returning '$cached' from cache" 2
>> + set cached_value $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>> + set cached_exit $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit)
>> + verbose "$name: returning '$cached_value' from cache" 2
>> if { $cache_verify == 0 } {
>> - return $cached
>> + gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit $name $cached_exit
>> + return $cached_value
>> }
>> set is_cached 1
>> }
>> @@ -83,24 +119,46 @@ proc gdb_do_cache {name args} {
>> set cache_filename [make_gdb_parallel_path cache $cache_name]
>> if {[file exists $cache_filename]} {
>> set fd [open $cache_filename]
>> - set gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value) [read -nonewline $fd]
>> + set content [split [read -nonewline $fd] \n]
>> close $fd
>> - set cached $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>> - verbose "$name: returning '$cached' from file cache" 2
>> + set gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value) [lindex $content 0]
>> + set gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit) [lindex $content 1]
>> + set cached_value $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>> + set cached_exit $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit)
>> + verbose "$name: returning '$cached_value' from file cache" 2
>> if { $cache_verify == 0 } {
>> - return $cached
>> + gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit $name $cached_exit
>> + return $cached_value
>> }
>> set is_cached 1
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - set real_name gdb_real__$name
>> - set gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value) [gdb_do_cache_wrap $real_name {*}$args]
>> + set ::gdb_exit_called false
>> + with_override gdb_exit wrap_gdb_exit orig_gdb_exit {
>> + set real_name gdb_real__$name
>> + set gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value) [gdb_do_cache_wrap $real_name {*}$args]
>> + }
>> + set gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit) $::gdb_exit_called
>> +
>> + # If a value being stored in the cache contains a newline then
>> + # when we try to read the value back from an on-disk cache file
>> + # we'll interpret the second line of the value as the ',exit' value.
>> + if { [regexp "\[\r\n\]" $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)] } {
>> + set computed_value $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>> + error "Newline found in value for $cache_name: $computed_value"
>> + }
>> +
>> if { $cache_verify == 1 && $is_cached == 1 } {
>> - set computed $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>> - if { $cached != $computed } {
>> - error [join [list "Inconsistent results for $cache_name:"
>> - "cached: $cached vs. computed: $computed"]]
>> + set computed_value $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>> + set computed_exit $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit)
>> + if { $cached_value != $computed_value } {
>> + error [join [list "Inconsistent value results for $cache_name:"
>> + "cached: $cached_value vs. computed: $computed_value"]]
>> + }
>> + if { $cached_exit != $computed_exit } {
>> + error [join [list "Inconsistent exit results for $cache_name:"
>> + "cached: $cached_exit vs. computed: $computed_exit"]]
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -110,9 +168,11 @@ proc gdb_do_cache {name args} {
>> # Make sure to write the results file atomically.
>> set fd [open $cache_filename.[pid] w]
>> puts $fd $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>> + puts $fd $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit)
>> close $fd
>> file rename -force -- $cache_filename.[pid] $cache_filename
>> }
>> + gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit $name $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit)
>> return $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>> index 8235d4f28eb..d29fd740f91 100644
>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>> @@ -6186,14 +6186,23 @@ proc gdb_exit { } {
>> catch default_gdb_exit
>> }
>>
>> -# Helper function for can_spawn_for_attach. Try to spawn and attach, and
>> -# return 0 only if we cannot attach because it's unsupported.
>> -
>> -gdb_caching_proc can_spawn_for_attach_1 {} {
>> - # For the benefit of gdb-caching-proc-consistency.exp, which
>> - # calls can_spawn_for_attach_1 directly. Keep in sync with
>> - # can_spawn_for_attach.
>> - if { [is_remote target] || [target_info exists use_gdb_stub] } {
>> +# Return true if we can spawn a program on the target and attach to
>> +# it.
>> +
>> +gdb_caching_proc can_spawn_for_attach {} {
>> + # We use exp_pid to get the inferior's pid, assuming that gives
>> + # back the pid of the program. On remote boards, that would give
>> + # us instead the PID of e.g., the ssh client, etc.
>> + if {[is_remote target]} {
>> + verbose -log "can't spawn for attach (target is remote)"
>> + return 0
>> + }
>> +
>> + # The "attach" command doesn't make sense when the target is
>> + # stub-like, where GDB finds the program already started on
>> + # initial connection.
>> + if {[target_info exists use_gdb_stub]} {
>> + verbose -log "can't spawn for attach (target is stub)"
>> return 0
>> }
>>
>> @@ -6218,6 +6227,9 @@ gdb_caching_proc can_spawn_for_attach_1 {} {
>> set test_spawn_id [spawn_wait_for_attach_1 $obj]
>> remote_file build delete $obj
>>
>> + # In case GDB is already running.
>> + gdb_exit
>> +
>> gdb_start
>>
>> set test_pid [spawn_id_get_pid $test_spawn_id]
>> @@ -6239,61 +6251,6 @@ gdb_caching_proc can_spawn_for_attach_1 {} {
>> return $res
>> }
>>
>> -# Return true if we can spawn a program on the target and attach to
>> -# it. Calls gdb_exit for the first call in a test-case.
>> -
>> -proc can_spawn_for_attach { } {
>> - # We use exp_pid to get the inferior's pid, assuming that gives
>> - # back the pid of the program. On remote boards, that would give
>> - # us instead the PID of e.g., the ssh client, etc.
>> - if {[is_remote target]} {
>> - verbose -log "can't spawn for attach (target is remote)"
>> - return 0
>> - }
>> -
>> - # The "attach" command doesn't make sense when the target is
>> - # stub-like, where GDB finds the program already started on
>> - # initial connection.
>> - if {[target_info exists use_gdb_stub]} {
>> - verbose -log "can't spawn for attach (target is stub)"
>> - return 0
>> - }
>> -
>> - # The normal sequence to use for a runtime test like
>> - # can_spawn_for_attach_1 is:
>> - # - gdb_exit (don't use a running gdb, we don't know what state it is in),
>> - # - gdb_start (start a new gdb), and
>> - # - gdb_exit (cleanup).
>> - #
>> - # By making can_spawn_for_attach_1 a gdb_caching_proc, we make it
>> - # unpredictable which test-case will call it first, and consequently a
>> - # test-case may pass in say a full test run, but fail when run
>> - # individually, due to a can_spawn_for_attach call in a location where a
>> - # gdb_exit (as can_spawn_for_attach_1 does) breaks things.
>> - # To avoid this, we move the initial gdb_exit out of
>> - # can_spawn_for_attach_1, guaranteeing that we end up in the same state
>> - # regardless of whether can_spawn_for_attach_1 is called. However, that
>> - # is only necessary for the first call in a test-case, so cache the result
>> - # in a global (which should be reset after each test-case) to keep track
>> - # of that.
>> - #
>> - # In summary, we distinguish between three cases:
>> - # - first call in first test-case. Executes can_spawn_for_attach_1.
>> - # Calls gdb_exit, gdb_start, gdb_exit.
>> - # - first call in following test-cases. Uses cached result of
>> - # can_spawn_for_attach_1. Calls gdb_exit.
>> - # - rest. Use cached result in cache_can_spawn_for_attach_1. Calls no
>> - # gdb_start or gdb_exit.
>> - global cache_can_spawn_for_attach_1
>> - if { [info exists cache_can_spawn_for_attach_1] } {
>> - return $cache_can_spawn_for_attach_1
>> - }
>> - gdb_exit
>> -
>> - set cache_can_spawn_for_attach_1 [can_spawn_for_attach_1]
>> - return $cache_can_spawn_for_attach_1
>> -}
>> -
>> # Centralize the failure checking of "attach" command.
>> # Return 0 if attach failed, otherwise return 1.
>>
>
> This is a bit after the fact, but I tracked down some aarch64 sme test regressions
> to this particular patch. I'm still investigating exactly why it stopped working, but I
> can tell it only happens if we run 2 or more tests in the same run. It is not
> clear if making things parallel has an impact, or if it is just the fact we
> run 2+ tests in the same run.
>
> I suspect we may be calling gdb_exit when we shouldn't, and then things just
> stop working.
>
> ---
>
> Running target unix
> Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target.
> Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
> Using repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/config/unix.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
> Running repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-0.exp ...
> Running repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-regs-unavailable-3.exp ...
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> FAIL: gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-regs-unavailable-3.exp: prctl, vl=32 svl=256: check_regs: incorrect ZA state
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> FAIL: gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-regs-unavailable-3.exp: gdb, vl=32 svl=256: check_regs: incorrect ZA state
>
> === gdb Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 12751
> # of unexpected failures 2
> # of unresolved testcases 11
>
> ---
>
> I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact we first invoke the gdb_caching_proc
> allow_aarch64_sme_tests which in turn calls the gdb_caching_proc aarch64_initialize_sme_information.
>
> Both call gdb_exit, because they run separate sets of tests. Maybe that gets recursive.
>
> This was uncovered now because sme tests are only executed in emulation, and that doesn't
> get tested as often as we'd like.
>
> Any thoughts?
I'd start with adding some logging in gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit
(lib/cache.exp) like:
proc gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit { name do_exit } {
if { !$do_exit } {
return
}
# To track if this proc has been called for NAME we create a
# global variable. In gdb_cleanup_globals (see gdb.exp) this
# global will be deleted when the test has finished.
set global_name __${name}__cached_gdb_exit_called
if { ![info exists ::${global_name}] } {
verbose -log "XXXX: gdb_exit triggered by cache"
gdb_exit
set ::${global_name} true
}
}
then check to see if this is triggered anywhere that you don't expect it
to.
I'll keep looking on my end to see if I can spot anything.
Thanks,
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-07 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-03 18:16 [PATCH 0/4] gdb/testsuite: remove can_spawn_for_attach_1 Andrew Burgess
2024-06-03 18:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] gdb/testsuite: remove trailing \r from rust_llvm_version result Andrew Burgess
2024-06-04 13:51 ` Tom Tromey
2024-06-05 9:20 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-06-03 18:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] gdb/testsuite: improve with_override Andrew Burgess
2024-06-03 18:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] gdb/testsuite: restructure gdb_data_cache (lib/cache.exp) Andrew Burgess
2024-06-03 18:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] gdb/testsuite: track if a caching proc calls gdb_exit or not Andrew Burgess
2024-08-07 6:05 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-07 9:16 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2024-08-07 10:00 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-07 10:08 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-07 10:12 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-07 12:45 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-07 14:31 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-07 18:35 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-08 10:20 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-08 10:50 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-08 11:08 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-08 14:50 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-09 11:29 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-13 16:30 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-14 13:06 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-14 17:00 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-15 6:03 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-20 15:25 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-06-04 9:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] gdb/testsuite: remove can_spawn_for_attach_1 Andrew Burgess
2024-06-05 13:27 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] " Andrew Burgess
2024-06-05 13:27 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] gdb/testsuite: restructure gdb_data_cache (lib/cache.exp) Andrew Burgess
2024-06-05 13:27 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] gdb/testsuite: track if a caching proc calls gdb_exit or not Andrew Burgess
2024-07-28 8:54 ` [PUSHED 0/2] gdb/testsuite: remove can_spawn_for_attach_1 Andrew Burgess
2024-07-28 8:54 ` [PUSHED 1/2] gdb/testsuite: restructure gdb_data_cache (lib/cache.exp) Andrew Burgess
2024-07-28 8:54 ` [PUSHED 2/2] gdb/testsuite: track if a caching proc calls gdb_exit or not Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zfpovgkr.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox