From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdb/testsuite: track if a caching proc calls gdb_exit or not
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 15:50:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xsbysp9.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <865dd933-bbfe-44d9-94e2-b7e133b05ed5@arm.com>
Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> writes:
> On 8/8/24 11:50, Luis Machado wrote:
>> On 8/8/24 11:20, Luis Machado wrote:
>>> On 8/7/24 15:31, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>>>> Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/3/24 19:16, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>>>>>> After a recent patch review I asked myself why can_spawn_for_attach
>>>>>> exists. This proc currently does some checks, and then calls
>>>>>> can_spawn_for_attach_1 which is an actual caching proc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The answer is that can_spawn_for_attach exists in order to call
>>>>>> gdb_exit the first time can_spawn_for_attach is called within any test
>>>>>> script.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reason this is useful is that can_spawn_for_attach_1 calls
>>>>>> gdb_exit. If imagine the user calling can_spawn_for_attach_1 directly
>>>>>> then a problem might exist. Imagine a test written like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gdb_start
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if { [can_spawn_for_attach_1] } {
>>>>>> ... do stuff that assumes GDB is running ...
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If this test is NOT the first test run, and if an earlier test calls
>>>>>> can_spawn_for_attach_1, then when the above test is run the
>>>>>> can_spawn_for_attach_1 call will return the cached value and gdb_exit
>>>>>> will not be called.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But, if the above test IS the first test run then
>>>>>> can_spawn_for_attach_1 will not returned the cached value, but will
>>>>>> instead compute the cached value, a process that ends up calling
>>>>>> gdb_exit. When the body of the if is executed GDB would no longer be
>>>>>> running and the test would fail!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So can_spawn_for_attach was added which ensures that we _always_ call
>>>>>> gdb_exit the first time can_spawn_for_attach is called within a single
>>>>>> test script, this ensures that in the above case, even if the above is
>>>>>> not the first test run, gdb_exit will still be called. This avoids
>>>>>> some hidden bugs in the testsuite.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, what I observe is that can_spawn_for_attach is not the only
>>>>>> caching proc that calls gdb_exit. Why does can_spawn_for_attach get
>>>>>> special treatment when surely the same issue exists for any other
>>>>>> caching proc that calls gdb_exit?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think a better solution is to move the logic from
>>>>>> can_spawn_for_attach into cache.exp and generalise it so that it
>>>>>> applies to all caching procs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This commit does this by:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. When the underlying caching proc is executed we wrap gdb_exit.
>>>>>> This wrapper sets a global to true if gdb_exit is called. The
>>>>>> value of this global is stored in gdb_data_cache (using a ',exit'
>>>>>> suffix), and also written to the cache file if appropriate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. When a cached value is returned from gdb_do_cache, if the
>>>>>> underlying proc would have called gdb_exit, and if this is the
>>>>>> first use of the caching proc in this test script, then we call
>>>>>> gdb_exit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When storing the ',exit' value into the on-disk cache file, the flag
>>>>>> value is stored on a second line. Currently every cached value only
>>>>>> occupies a single line, and a check is added to ensure this remains
>>>>>> true in the future.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One issue did come up in testing, a FAIL in gdb.base/break-interp.exp,
>>>>>> this was caused by can_spawn_for_attach_1 calling gdb_start without
>>>>>> first calling gdb_exit. Under the old way of doing things
>>>>>> can_spawn_for_attach would call gdb_exit _before_ possibly calling the
>>>>>> actual caching proc. Under the new scheme gdb_exit is called _after_
>>>>>> calling the actual caching proc. What was happening was that
>>>>>> break-interp.exp would leave GDB running then call
>>>>>> can_spawn_for_attach, when the test in can_spawn_for_attach_1 tried to
>>>>>> attach to the inferior, state left in the running GDB would cause some
>>>>>> unexpected behaviour. Fixed by having can_spawn_for_attach_1 call
>>>>>> gdb_exit before calling gdb_start, this ensures we have a fresh GDB.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With this done can_spawn_for_attach_1 can be renamed to
>>>>>> can_spawn_for_attach, and the existing can_spawn_for_attach can be
>>>>>> deleted.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>>>> gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp | 83 +++++++++--------------------------
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp
>>>>>> index e7b9114058b..fef065ec8b0 100644
>>>>>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp
>>>>>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp
>>>>>> @@ -46,6 +46,40 @@ proc gdb_do_cache_wrap {real_name args} {
>>>>>> return $result
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +# Global written to by wrap_gdb_exit. Set to true if wrap_gdb_exit is
>>>>>> +# called.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +set gdb_exit_called false
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +# Wrapper around gdb_exit. Use with_override to replace gdb_exit with
>>>>>> +# wrap_gdb_exit, the original gdb_exit is renamed to orig_gdb_exit.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +proc wrap_gdb_exit {} {
>>>>>> + set ::gdb_exit_called true
>>>>>> + orig_gdb_exit
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +# If DO_EXIT is false then this proc does nothing. If DO_EXIT is true
>>>>>> +# then call gdb_exit the first time this proc is called for each
>>>>>> +# unique value of NAME within a single test. Every subsequent time
>>>>>> +# this proc is called within a single test (for a given value of
>>>>>> +# NAME), don't call gdb_exit.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +proc gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit { name do_exit } {
>>>>>> + if { !$do_exit } {
>>>>>> + return
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + # To track if this proc has been called for NAME we create a
>>>>>> + # global variable. In gdb_cleanup_globals (see gdb.exp) this
>>>>>> + # global will be deleted when the test has finished.
>>>>>> + set global_name __${name}__cached_gdb_exit_called
>>>>>> + if { ![info exists ::${global_name}] } {
>>>>>> + gdb_exit
>>>>>> + set ::${global_name} true
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> # A helper for gdb_caching_proc that handles the caching.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> proc gdb_do_cache {name args} {
>>>>>> @@ -71,10 +105,12 @@ proc gdb_do_cache {name args} {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> set is_cached 0
>>>>>> if {[info exists gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)]} {
>>>>>> - set cached $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>>>>>> - verbose "$name: returning '$cached' from cache" 2
>>>>>> + set cached_value $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>>>>>> + set cached_exit $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit)
>>>>>> + verbose "$name: returning '$cached_value' from cache" 2
>>>>>> if { $cache_verify == 0 } {
>>>>>> - return $cached
>>>>>> + gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit $name $cached_exit
>>>>>> + return $cached_value
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> set is_cached 1
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> @@ -83,24 +119,46 @@ proc gdb_do_cache {name args} {
>>>>>> set cache_filename [make_gdb_parallel_path cache $cache_name]
>>>>>> if {[file exists $cache_filename]} {
>>>>>> set fd [open $cache_filename]
>>>>>> - set gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value) [read -nonewline $fd]
>>>>>> + set content [split [read -nonewline $fd] \n]
>>>>>> close $fd
>>>>>> - set cached $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>>>>>> - verbose "$name: returning '$cached' from file cache" 2
>>>>>> + set gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value) [lindex $content 0]
>>>>>> + set gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit) [lindex $content 1]
>>>>>> + set cached_value $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>>>>>> + set cached_exit $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit)
>>>>>> + verbose "$name: returning '$cached_value' from file cache" 2
>>>>>> if { $cache_verify == 0 } {
>>>>>> - return $cached
>>>>>> + gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit $name $cached_exit
>>>>>> + return $cached_value
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> set is_cached 1
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - set real_name gdb_real__$name
>>>>>> - set gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value) [gdb_do_cache_wrap $real_name {*}$args]
>>>>>> + set ::gdb_exit_called false
>>>>>> + with_override gdb_exit wrap_gdb_exit orig_gdb_exit {
>>>>>> + set real_name gdb_real__$name
>>>>>> + set gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value) [gdb_do_cache_wrap $real_name {*}$args]
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + set gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit) $::gdb_exit_called
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + # If a value being stored in the cache contains a newline then
>>>>>> + # when we try to read the value back from an on-disk cache file
>>>>>> + # we'll interpret the second line of the value as the ',exit' value.
>>>>>> + if { [regexp "\[\r\n\]" $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)] } {
>>>>>> + set computed_value $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>>>>>> + error "Newline found in value for $cache_name: $computed_value"
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> if { $cache_verify == 1 && $is_cached == 1 } {
>>>>>> - set computed $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>>>>>> - if { $cached != $computed } {
>>>>>> - error [join [list "Inconsistent results for $cache_name:"
>>>>>> - "cached: $cached vs. computed: $computed"]]
>>>>>> + set computed_value $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>>>>>> + set computed_exit $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit)
>>>>>> + if { $cached_value != $computed_value } {
>>>>>> + error [join [list "Inconsistent value results for $cache_name:"
>>>>>> + "cached: $cached_value vs. computed: $computed_value"]]
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> + if { $cached_exit != $computed_exit } {
>>>>>> + error [join [list "Inconsistent exit results for $cache_name:"
>>>>>> + "cached: $cached_exit vs. computed: $computed_exit"]]
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -110,9 +168,11 @@ proc gdb_do_cache {name args} {
>>>>>> # Make sure to write the results file atomically.
>>>>>> set fd [open $cache_filename.[pid] w]
>>>>>> puts $fd $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>>>>>> + puts $fd $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit)
>>>>>> close $fd
>>>>>> file rename -force -- $cache_filename.[pid] $cache_filename
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> + gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit $name $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},exit)
>>>>>> return $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},value)
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>>>>>> index 8235d4f28eb..d29fd740f91 100644
>>>>>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>>>>>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
>>>>>> @@ -6186,14 +6186,23 @@ proc gdb_exit { } {
>>>>>> catch default_gdb_exit
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -# Helper function for can_spawn_for_attach. Try to spawn and attach, and
>>>>>> -# return 0 only if we cannot attach because it's unsupported.
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> -gdb_caching_proc can_spawn_for_attach_1 {} {
>>>>>> - # For the benefit of gdb-caching-proc-consistency.exp, which
>>>>>> - # calls can_spawn_for_attach_1 directly. Keep in sync with
>>>>>> - # can_spawn_for_attach.
>>>>>> - if { [is_remote target] || [target_info exists use_gdb_stub] } {
>>>>>> +# Return true if we can spawn a program on the target and attach to
>>>>>> +# it.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +gdb_caching_proc can_spawn_for_attach {} {
>>>>>> + # We use exp_pid to get the inferior's pid, assuming that gives
>>>>>> + # back the pid of the program. On remote boards, that would give
>>>>>> + # us instead the PID of e.g., the ssh client, etc.
>>>>>> + if {[is_remote target]} {
>>>>>> + verbose -log "can't spawn for attach (target is remote)"
>>>>>> + return 0
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + # The "attach" command doesn't make sense when the target is
>>>>>> + # stub-like, where GDB finds the program already started on
>>>>>> + # initial connection.
>>>>>> + if {[target_info exists use_gdb_stub]} {
>>>>>> + verbose -log "can't spawn for attach (target is stub)"
>>>>>> return 0
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -6218,6 +6227,9 @@ gdb_caching_proc can_spawn_for_attach_1 {} {
>>>>>> set test_spawn_id [spawn_wait_for_attach_1 $obj]
>>>>>> remote_file build delete $obj
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + # In case GDB is already running.
>>>>>> + gdb_exit
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> gdb_start
>>>>>>
>>>>>> set test_pid [spawn_id_get_pid $test_spawn_id]
>>>>>> @@ -6239,61 +6251,6 @@ gdb_caching_proc can_spawn_for_attach_1 {} {
>>>>>> return $res
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -# Return true if we can spawn a program on the target and attach to
>>>>>> -# it. Calls gdb_exit for the first call in a test-case.
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> -proc can_spawn_for_attach { } {
>>>>>> - # We use exp_pid to get the inferior's pid, assuming that gives
>>>>>> - # back the pid of the program. On remote boards, that would give
>>>>>> - # us instead the PID of e.g., the ssh client, etc.
>>>>>> - if {[is_remote target]} {
>>>>>> - verbose -log "can't spawn for attach (target is remote)"
>>>>>> - return 0
>>>>>> - }
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> - # The "attach" command doesn't make sense when the target is
>>>>>> - # stub-like, where GDB finds the program already started on
>>>>>> - # initial connection.
>>>>>> - if {[target_info exists use_gdb_stub]} {
>>>>>> - verbose -log "can't spawn for attach (target is stub)"
>>>>>> - return 0
>>>>>> - }
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> - # The normal sequence to use for a runtime test like
>>>>>> - # can_spawn_for_attach_1 is:
>>>>>> - # - gdb_exit (don't use a running gdb, we don't know what state it is in),
>>>>>> - # - gdb_start (start a new gdb), and
>>>>>> - # - gdb_exit (cleanup).
>>>>>> - #
>>>>>> - # By making can_spawn_for_attach_1 a gdb_caching_proc, we make it
>>>>>> - # unpredictable which test-case will call it first, and consequently a
>>>>>> - # test-case may pass in say a full test run, but fail when run
>>>>>> - # individually, due to a can_spawn_for_attach call in a location where a
>>>>>> - # gdb_exit (as can_spawn_for_attach_1 does) breaks things.
>>>>>> - # To avoid this, we move the initial gdb_exit out of
>>>>>> - # can_spawn_for_attach_1, guaranteeing that we end up in the same state
>>>>>> - # regardless of whether can_spawn_for_attach_1 is called. However, that
>>>>>> - # is only necessary for the first call in a test-case, so cache the result
>>>>>> - # in a global (which should be reset after each test-case) to keep track
>>>>>> - # of that.
>>>>>> - #
>>>>>> - # In summary, we distinguish between three cases:
>>>>>> - # - first call in first test-case. Executes can_spawn_for_attach_1.
>>>>>> - # Calls gdb_exit, gdb_start, gdb_exit.
>>>>>> - # - first call in following test-cases. Uses cached result of
>>>>>> - # can_spawn_for_attach_1. Calls gdb_exit.
>>>>>> - # - rest. Use cached result in cache_can_spawn_for_attach_1. Calls no
>>>>>> - # gdb_start or gdb_exit.
>>>>>> - global cache_can_spawn_for_attach_1
>>>>>> - if { [info exists cache_can_spawn_for_attach_1] } {
>>>>>> - return $cache_can_spawn_for_attach_1
>>>>>> - }
>>>>>> - gdb_exit
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> - set cache_can_spawn_for_attach_1 [can_spawn_for_attach_1]
>>>>>> - return $cache_can_spawn_for_attach_1
>>>>>> -}
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> # Centralize the failure checking of "attach" command.
>>>>>> # Return 0 if attach failed, otherwise return 1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a bit after the fact, but I tracked down some aarch64 sme test regressions
>>>>> to this particular patch. I'm still investigating exactly why it stopped working, but I
>>>>> can tell it only happens if we run 2 or more tests in the same run. It is not
>>>>> clear if making things parallel has an impact, or if it is just the fact we
>>>>> run 2+ tests in the same run.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suspect we may be calling gdb_exit when we shouldn't, and then things just
>>>>> stop working.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Running target unix
>>>>> Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target.
>>>>> Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
>>>>> Using repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/config/unix.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
>>>>> Running repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-0.exp ...
>>>>> Running repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-regs-unavailable-3.exp ...
>>>>> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
>>>>> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
>>>>> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
>>>>> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
>>>>> FAIL: gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-regs-unavailable-3.exp: prctl, vl=32 svl=256: check_regs: incorrect ZA state
>>>>> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
>>>>> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
>>>>> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
>>>>> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
>>>>> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
>>>>> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
>>>>> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
>>>>> FAIL: gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-regs-unavailable-3.exp: gdb, vl=32 svl=256: check_regs: incorrect ZA state
>>>>
>>>> Luis,
>>>>
>>>> Could you please test the patch below to see if this fixes the issues
>>>> you are seeing. This is also running through local testing at my side,
>>>> but I thought I'd get your feedback early.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, it's one of those things I guess. I saw some errors the first time I tried the patch, but then
>>> I couldn't reproduce it anymore. So far it's been running pretty smoothly for both parallel and
>>> serialized runs. So I'd say this patch does the job and we should push it.
>>> Thanks for putting it together.
>>>
>>> I'll do a complete run overnight just to make sure, but it will take a little bit before I can report
>>> it.
>>
>> Of course, a short while after sending this, I managed to reproduce the error.
>>
>> I'm running the following:
>>
>> make check-gdb TESTS=gdb.arch/*.exp -j$(nproc). Let me fetch some more information.
>
> It seems we're hitting the same situation with aarch64_initialize_sve_information via aarch64_supports_sve_vl,
> which causes the testsuite to call gdb_exit.
>
> It is as you described, it is the first time we're running gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2.exp, so we go through
> caching etc.
>
> ---
>
> Running builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2.exp ...
> gdb_caching_proc allow_aarch64_sve_tests caused gdb_exit to be called
> stack trace is Stack trace:
> gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit proc_name='allow_aarch64_sve_tests' cache_name='unix/allow_aarch64_sve_tests'
> gdb_do_cache name='allow_aarch64_sve_tests' args=''
> allow_aarch64_sve_tests
This makes sense assuming that this is not the first time
`allow_aarch64_sve_tests` was called in this test run. This looks like
its using the previously cached result.
If all had gone as expected then this should have marked `gdb_exit` as
having been called for both `allow_aarch64_sve_tests` and
`aarch64_initialize_sve_information`, though given what happens below I
guess that the marker for `aarch64_initialize_sve_information` isn't
being created correctly.
You could try applying this patch:
### START ###
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp
index 7e1eae9259e..d6027b352f1 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/cache.exp
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ proc gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit { proc_name cache_name } {
set ::${global_name} true
foreach other_name $gdb_data_cache(${cache_name},also_called) {
+ verbose -log " gdb_caching_proc $other_name also called exit"
set global_name __${other_name}__cached_gdb_exit_called
set ::${global_name} true
}
@@ -110,6 +111,8 @@ proc gdb_do_cache {name args} {
global gdb_data_cache objdir
global GDB_PARALLEL
+ verbose -log "gdb_do_cache: $name ( $args )"
+
# Normally, if we have a cached value, we skip computation and return
# the cached value. If set to 1, instead don't skip computation and
# verify against the cached value.
### END ###
which will log the "other" caching procs that are recorded as having
been called.
Also, if you are running `make -j...." then you can look into the cache
files which will be 'gdb/testsuite/cache/unix/allow_aarch64_sve_tests'
and 'gdb/testsuite/cache/unix/aarch64_initialize_sve_information' as
this should also include the information about the nested caching proc
structure.
>
> gdb_caching_proc allow_aarch64_sme_tests caused gdb_exit to be called
> stack trace is Stack trace:
> gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit proc_name='allow_aarch64_sme_tests' cache_name='unix/allow_aarch64_sme_tests'
> gdb_do_cache name='allow_aarch64_sme_tests' args=''
> allow_aarch64_sme_tests
>
> get_compiler_info: gcc-13-2-0
> Executing on host: gcc -fno-stack-protector -fdiagnostics-color=never -g3 -march=armv8.5-a+sve -c -g -o builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2/aarch64-sme-core-20.o builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core.c (timeout = 300)
> builtin_spawn -ignore SIGHUP gcc -fno-stack-protector -fdiagnostics-color=never -g3 -march=armv8.5-a+sve -c -g -o builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2/aarch64-sme-core-20.o builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core.c
> Executing on host: gcc -fno-stack-protector builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2/aarch64-sme-core-20.o -fdiagnostics-color=never -g3 -march=armv8.5-a+sve -g -lm -o builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2/aarch64-sme-core-2 (timeout = 300)
> builtin_spawn -ignore SIGHUP gcc -fno-stack-protector builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2/aarch64-sme-core-20.o -fdiagnostics-color=never -g3 -march=armv8.5-a+sve -g -lm -o builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2/aarch64-sme-core-2
> builtin_spawn builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb -nw -nx -q -iex set height 0 -iex set width 0 -data-directory builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/data-directory
> (gdb) set height 0
> (gdb) set width 0
> (gdb) dir
> Reinitialize source path to empty? (y or n) y
> Source directories searched: $cdir:$cwd
> (gdb) dir builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch
> Source directories searched: builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch:$cdir:$cwd
> (gdb) kill
> The program is not being run.
> (gdb) file builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2/aarch64-sme-core-2
> Reading symbols from builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2/aarch64-sme-core-2...
> (gdb) gdb_caching_proc aarch64_initialize_sve_information caused gdb_exit to be called
> stack trace is Stack trace:
> gdb_cache_maybe_gdb_exit proc_name='aarch64_initialize_sve_information' cache_name='unix/aarch64_initialize_sve_information'
> gdb_do_cache name='aarch64_initialize_sve_information' args=''
> aarch64_initialize_sve_information
> aarch64_supports_sve_vl length='16'
> test_sme_core_file id_start='50' id_end='74'
This should have been prevented by the earlier allow_aarch64_sve_tests
call. Either we failed to correctly spot the relationship between the
two caching procs, or we're failing to mark this second one as having
been called for some reason...
I think we need more data to try and debug this...
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> Couldn't send delete breakpoints to GDB.
> UNRESOLVED: gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2.exp: state=ssve vl=16 svl=16: delete all breakpoints, watchpoints, tracepoints, and catchpoints in delete_breakpoints
> ERROR: breakpoints not deleted
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> Couldn't send break -qualified main to GDB.
> UNRESOLVED: gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2.exp: state=ssve vl=16 svl=16: gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at main
> ERROR: no fileid for ubuntu
> UNRESOLVED: gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2.exp: state=ssve vl=16 svl=16: runto: run to main (timeout)
> UNTESTED: gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2.exp: state=ssve vl=16 svl=16: could not run to main
> testcase builds/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/aarch64-sme-core-2.exp completed in 73 seconds
>
> ---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-08 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-03 18:16 [PATCH 0/4] gdb/testsuite: remove can_spawn_for_attach_1 Andrew Burgess
2024-06-03 18:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] gdb/testsuite: remove trailing \r from rust_llvm_version result Andrew Burgess
2024-06-04 13:51 ` Tom Tromey
2024-06-05 9:20 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-06-03 18:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] gdb/testsuite: improve with_override Andrew Burgess
2024-06-03 18:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] gdb/testsuite: restructure gdb_data_cache (lib/cache.exp) Andrew Burgess
2024-06-03 18:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] gdb/testsuite: track if a caching proc calls gdb_exit or not Andrew Burgess
2024-08-07 6:05 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-07 9:16 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-07 10:00 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-07 10:08 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-07 10:12 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-07 12:45 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-07 14:31 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-07 18:35 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-08 10:20 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-08 10:50 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-08 11:08 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-08 14:50 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2024-08-09 11:29 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-13 16:30 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-14 13:06 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-14 17:00 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-15 6:03 ` Luis Machado
2024-08-20 15:25 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-06-04 9:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] gdb/testsuite: remove can_spawn_for_attach_1 Andrew Burgess
2024-06-05 13:27 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] " Andrew Burgess
2024-06-05 13:27 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] gdb/testsuite: restructure gdb_data_cache (lib/cache.exp) Andrew Burgess
2024-06-05 13:27 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] gdb/testsuite: track if a caching proc calls gdb_exit or not Andrew Burgess
2024-07-28 8:54 ` [PUSHED 0/2] gdb/testsuite: remove can_spawn_for_attach_1 Andrew Burgess
2024-07-28 8:54 ` [PUSHED 1/2] gdb/testsuite: restructure gdb_data_cache (lib/cache.exp) Andrew Burgess
2024-07-28 8:54 ` [PUSHED 2/2] gdb/testsuite: track if a caching proc calls gdb_exit or not Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875xsbysp9.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox