Re: [RFA] Improve completion of locations

[Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>]

Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com> writes:

> Thanks Elena and Daniel for your reviews of Eli's patch.  I really
> appreciate it.
> 
> Eli, Your original patch with the fix you've added as per Daniel
> request, Elena's "++" suggestion and the adjusts to after JT's changes
> is approved.
> 
> As I said, the evil is in the original definition of "linespecs" which
> leads to so many ambiguous cases. So, we will have to live with
> incremental fixes (and eventually unwanted side-effects).

Do you know where else besides list and break linespecs are used?

I have a parser/lexer ready to replace the decode_line_1 usage for
*breakpoints* (not list), but I want to make sure i catch all the
places i could use it.

> 
> And thank you very much for all the completer improvements you've sent.
> 
> Regards,
> Fernando
> 
> P.S.: My apologies for the delay in responding.  I have a considerably
> long queue of patches to review right now.
> 
> -- 
> Fernando Nasser
> Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
> 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
> Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9

-- 
"I watched the Indy 500, and I was thinking that if they left
earlier they wouldn't have to go so fast.
"-Steven Wright