From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Berlin To: Fernando Nasser Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Improve completion of locations Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 09:14:00 -0000 Message-id: <87vgm4s45e.fsf@cgsoftware.com> References: <9743-Sat05May2001210007+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3B239593.24B7C578@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00199.html Fernando Nasser writes: > Thanks Elena and Daniel for your reviews of Eli's patch. I really > appreciate it. > > Eli, Your original patch with the fix you've added as per Daniel > request, Elena's "++" suggestion and the adjusts to after JT's changes > is approved. > > As I said, the evil is in the original definition of "linespecs" which > leads to so many ambiguous cases. So, we will have to live with > incremental fixes (and eventually unwanted side-effects). Do you know where else besides list and break linespecs are used? I have a parser/lexer ready to replace the decode_line_1 usage for *breakpoints* (not list), but I want to make sure i catch all the places i could use it. > > And thank you very much for all the completer improvements you've sent. > > Regards, > Fernando > > P.S.: My apologies for the delay in responding. I have a considerably > long queue of patches to review right now. > > -- > Fernando Nasser > Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com > 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 > Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9 -- "I watched the Indy 500, and I was thinking that if they left earlier they wouldn't have to go so fast. "-Steven Wright