Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
To: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,  luis.machado@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] gdb: aarch64: Move MTE address check out of set_memtag
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 22:55:58 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v84v9rv5.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <322b8080-d9f4-7741-4358-ca6f0de4b7f5@linaro.org> (Gustavo Romero's message of "Thu, 4 Apr 2024 02:25:02 -0300")

Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org> writes:

> On 3/29/24 9:47 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>>> Move MTE address check out of set_memtag and add this check to the
>>> upper layer, before set_memtag is called. This is a preparation for
>>> using a target hook instead of a gdbarch hook MTE address checks.
>> gdbarch_set_memtags is also called from
>> memory_tag_with_logical_tag_command. Shouldn't the same check be added
>> there?
>
> In aarch64_linux_set_memtags, the memory check is inside the else {}, which
> is only executed when tag_type == memtag_type::allocation, but not in the if {},
> which is executed when memtag_type::logical. Because
> memory_tag_with_logical_tag_command always calls set_memtags with the argument
> for tag_type param == memtag_type::logical there is no need to check the address.
>
> In other words, memory_tag_with_logical_tag_command is about logical tags only,
> so it's a local operation that does not touch any memory in the target, it just
> changes a local pointer, so it's ok to change the pointer, being it tagged or not,
> hence not memory checks are needed.
>
> These comments try to clarify a bit it:
>
> In memory_tag_with_logical_tag_command:
>
>   /* Setting the logical tag is just a local operation that does not touch
>      any memory from the target.  Given an input value, we modify the value
>      to include the appropriate tag.  <--
>
>
> In memory_tag_print_tag_command:
>
>   /* If the address is not in a region memory mapped with a memory tagging
>      flag, it is no use trying to access/manipulate its allocation tag.
>
>      It is OK to manipulate the logical tag though.  */ <--

Thanks for the explanation, makes sense!

--
Thiago

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-06  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-28 22:48 [PATCH v2 0/4] Add another way to check for MTE-tagged addresses on remote targets Gustavo Romero
2024-03-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] gdb: aarch64: Remove MTE address checking from get_memtag Gustavo Romero
2024-03-30  0:37   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-30  0:55     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-04  5:15       ` Gustavo Romero
2024-03-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] gdb: aarch64: Move MTE address check out of set_memtag Gustavo Romero
2024-03-30  0:47   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-04  5:25     ` Gustavo Romero
2024-04-06  1:55       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2024-03-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] gdb: aarch64: Remove MTE address checking from memtag_matches_p Gustavo Romero
2024-03-30  2:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] gdb: Add new remote packet to check if address is tagged Gustavo Romero
2024-03-29 23:35   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-04  5:32     ` Gustavo Romero
2024-03-30  3:08   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-03 14:04     ` Luis Machado
2024-04-03 16:39       ` Gustavo Romero
2024-04-03 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Add another way to check for MTE-tagged addresses on remote targets Luis Machado
2024-04-03 14:29   ` Gustavo Romero
2024-04-03 14:39     ` Luis Machado
2024-04-04  5:35       ` Gustavo Romero

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v84v9rv5.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gustavo.romero@linaro.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox