Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
To: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,  luis.machado@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] gdb: aarch64: Move MTE address check out of set_memtag
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:47:12 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msqg8s1b.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240328224850.2785280-3-gustavo.romero@linaro.org> (Gustavo Romero's message of "Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:48:48 +0000")

Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org> writes:

> Move MTE address check out of set_memtag and add this check to the
> upper layer, before set_memtag is called. This is a preparation for
> using a target hook instead of a gdbarch hook MTE address checks.

gdbarch_set_memtags is also called from
memory_tag_with_logical_tag_command. Shouldn't the same check be added
there?

>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
> ---
>  gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c | 4 ----
>  gdb/printcmd.c           | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c b/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c
> index 50055ac3f48..8e6e63d4dcb 100644
> --- a/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c
> @@ -2525,10 +2525,6 @@ aarch64_linux_set_memtags (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct value *address,
>        /* Remove the top byte.  */
>        addr = gdbarch_remove_non_address_bits (gdbarch, addr);
>
> -      /* Make sure we are dealing with a tagged address to begin with.  */
> -      if (!aarch64_linux_tagged_address_p (gdbarch, address))
> -	return false;
> -
>        /* With G being the number of tag granules and N the number of tags
>  	 passed in, we can have the following cases:
>
> diff --git a/gdb/printcmd.c b/gdb/printcmd.c
> index cb0d32aa4bc..ae4d640ccf2 100644
> --- a/gdb/printcmd.c
> +++ b/gdb/printcmd.c
> @@ -3127,6 +3127,12 @@ memory_tag_set_allocation_tag_command (const char *args, int from_tty)
>    /* Parse the input.  */
>    parse_set_allocation_tag_input (args, &val, &length, tags);
>
> +  /* If the address is not in a region memory mapped with a memory tagging
> +     flag, it is no use trying to manipulate its allocation tag.  */
> +  if (!gdbarch_tagged_address_p (current_inferior ()->arch (), val)) {
> +    show_addr_not_tagged (value_as_address(val));
> +  }

GNU style doesn't use curly braces in if blocks with only one statement.

> +
>    if (!gdbarch_set_memtags (current_inferior ()->arch (), val, length, tags,
>  			    memtag_type::allocation))
>      gdb_printf (_("Could not update the allocation tag(s).\n"));

--
Thiago

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-30  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-28 22:48 [PATCH v2 0/4] Add another way to check for MTE-tagged addresses on remote targets Gustavo Romero
2024-03-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] gdb: aarch64: Remove MTE address checking from get_memtag Gustavo Romero
2024-03-30  0:37   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-30  0:55     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-04  5:15       ` Gustavo Romero
2024-03-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] gdb: aarch64: Move MTE address check out of set_memtag Gustavo Romero
2024-03-30  0:47   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2024-04-04  5:25     ` Gustavo Romero
2024-04-06  1:55       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] gdb: aarch64: Remove MTE address checking from memtag_matches_p Gustavo Romero
2024-03-30  2:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] gdb: Add new remote packet to check if address is tagged Gustavo Romero
2024-03-29 23:35   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-04  5:32     ` Gustavo Romero
2024-03-30  3:08   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-03 14:04     ` Luis Machado
2024-04-03 16:39       ` Gustavo Romero
2024-04-03 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Add another way to check for MTE-tagged addresses on remote targets Luis Machado
2024-04-03 14:29   ` Gustavo Romero
2024-04-03 14:39     ` Luis Machado
2024-04-04  5:35       ` Gustavo Romero

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87msqg8s1b.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gustavo.romero@linaro.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox