Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
To: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,  luis.machado@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] gdb: aarch64: Remove MTE address checking from memtag_matches_p
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 23:53:50 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xx48m69.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240328224850.2785280-4-gustavo.romero@linaro.org> (Gustavo Romero's message of "Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:48:49 +0000")

Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org> writes:

> This commit removes aarch64_linux_tagged_address_p from
> aarch64_linux_memtag_matches_p. aarch64_linux_tagged_address_p checks if
> an address is tagged (MTE) or not.
>
> The check is redundant because aarch64_linux_memtag_matches_p is always
> called from the upper layers (i.e. from printcmd.c via gdbarch hook
> gdbarch_memtag_matches_p) after either gdbarch_tagged_address_p (that
> already points to aarch64_linux_tagged_address_p) has been called or
> after should_validate_memtags (that calls gdbarch_tagged_address_p at
> the end) has been called, so the address is already checked. Hence:
>
> a) in print_command_1, gdbarch_memtag_matches_p is called only after
> should_validate_memtags is called, which checks the address at its end;
>
> b) in memory_tag_check_command, gdbarch_memtag_matches_p is called only
> after gdbarch_tagged_address_p is called directly.
>
> Also, because after this change the address checking only happens at the
> upper layer it now allows the address checking to be specialized easily
> per target, via a target hook.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
> ---
>  gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

Looks good to me. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>

--
Thiago

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-30  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-28 22:48 [PATCH v2 0/4] Add another way to check for MTE-tagged addresses on remote targets Gustavo Romero
2024-03-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] gdb: aarch64: Remove MTE address checking from get_memtag Gustavo Romero
2024-03-30  0:37   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-30  0:55     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-04  5:15       ` Gustavo Romero
2024-03-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] gdb: aarch64: Move MTE address check out of set_memtag Gustavo Romero
2024-03-30  0:47   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-04  5:25     ` Gustavo Romero
2024-04-06  1:55       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-03-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] gdb: aarch64: Remove MTE address checking from memtag_matches_p Gustavo Romero
2024-03-30  2:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2024-03-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] gdb: Add new remote packet to check if address is tagged Gustavo Romero
2024-03-29 23:35   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-04  5:32     ` Gustavo Romero
2024-03-30  3:08   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-04-03 14:04     ` Luis Machado
2024-04-03 16:39       ` Gustavo Romero
2024-04-03 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Add another way to check for MTE-tagged addresses on remote targets Luis Machado
2024-04-03 14:29   ` Gustavo Romero
2024-04-03 14:39     ` Luis Machado
2024-04-04  5:35       ` Gustavo Romero

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875xx48m69.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gustavo.romero@linaro.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox