From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/17] Merge event loop implementations
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 02:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tv3taoxl.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a7apeesm.fsf@tromey.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:10:17 -0600")
Tom> However, my hope was that unifying on the gdb approach would be good
Tom> enough. And, while debugging on Windows this week, I happened (I forgot
Tom> to look before starting, so it's kind of a goofy accident) to use this
Tom> event unification branch. I used gdb and also tried gdbserver, and as
Tom> far as I can tell, everything worked fine.
I rebased this series recently.
I wasn't sure what the status really was. I thought this at the time:
Tom> So, my view is that the current patch series is probably roughly ok.
... meaning that gdb_fildes_t could be removed and replaced with plain
"int", and nothing else would have to change.
I can re-test the series on Windows. The updates due to rebasing were
all mechanical, though, stuff like making sure the files were moved into
the now-correct directories.
I thought maybe we could use gdb_select in gdbsupport, but now I see it
reaches into the serial code, so maybe that isn't so easy after all.
Let me know what you think.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-14 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-24 16:51 Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 05/17] Remove gdb_usleep.c Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:02 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-26 14:43 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 04/17] Move gdb_select.h to common/ Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 09/17] Introduce async-event.[ch] Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:06 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-04 22:17 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 06/17] Include <chrono> in event-loop.c Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:02 ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 14/17] Remove some dead code from event-loop.c Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 10/17] Move event-loop.[ch] to common/ Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:06 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-04 22:06 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 13/17] Switch gdbserver to common event loop Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 17/17] Simplify gdbserver's serial event handling Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 17:36 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-04 22:08 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 07/17] Use warning in event-loop Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:02 ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 03/17] Move event-loop configury to common.m4 Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 15/17] Move gdb_notifier comment Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:06 ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 08/17] Introduce and use flush_streams Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 02/17] Move gdb-specific code out of start_event_loop Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:02 ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 11/17] Implement event-loop glue for gdbserver Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 16/17] Remove gdb_fildes_t Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 12/17] Add the ability to stop the event loop Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 01/17] Remove include from event-loop.c Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 17:14 ` [RFC 00/17] Merge event loop implementations Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-24 17:26 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 17:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-25 19:57 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-25 20:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-25 20:55 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-26 16:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-26 16:23 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-26 16:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-09-26 17:47 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-26 23:09 ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-27 13:53 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-27 14:05 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-27 14:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-09-27 14:53 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-27 15:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-09-27 19:10 ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-14 2:22 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2020-02-14 17:58 ` Pedro Alves
2020-02-14 18:36 ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-04 22:25 ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-14 18:20 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tv3taoxl.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox