From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/17] Merge event loop implementations
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87va19jdy4.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83sgwdnm6r.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:14:20 +0200")
>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
Eli> The problem here is that Windows' implementation of 'select' works
Eli> only on sockets, and wants HSOCKET handles instead of file
Eli> descriptors. If you feed it a file descriptor, it won't work, even if
Eli> the descriptor is for a socket.
Thanks.
I am still not sure what to do. Move the mingw-hdep select code to
common? Or is it better to reintroduce gdb_fildes_t and use it
everywhere? The former seems simpler I suppose, but the way that the
mingw-hdep select implementation relies on readline gives me pause.
Though perhaps that code will be removed in the readline upgrade, when I
get back to that? So one idea might be to try to land that first.
Eli> I cannot really tell, by reading the patches, what code would
Eli> gdbserver on Windows use after this series, so I don't know whether it
Eli> will be broken or not. But one thing I do see is that mingw-hdep.c
Eli> doesn't support waiting on write descriptors, whereas gdbserver's
Eli> event-loop.c seems to support that.
Both event loops claim to support it, but in practice it isn't actually
exposed via the API -- the only exposed API is add_file_handler, which
doesn't allow for requesting a write notification. All the write stuff
is dead code.
One other thing I forgot to mention is that maybe it would be nice to
just remove gdb's event loop entirely in favor of something like
libevent. Though of course it is a pain to introduce a new dependency.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-24 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-24 16:51 Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 06/17] Include <chrono> in event-loop.c Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:02 ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 09/17] Introduce async-event.[ch] Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:06 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-04 22:17 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 05/17] Remove gdb_usleep.c Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:02 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-26 14:43 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 04/17] Move gdb_select.h to common/ Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 17/17] Simplify gdbserver's serial event handling Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 17:36 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-04 22:08 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 13/17] Switch gdbserver to common event loop Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 10/17] Move event-loop.[ch] to common/ Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:06 ` Pedro Alves
2019-10-04 22:06 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 14/17] Remove some dead code from event-loop.c Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 02/17] Move gdb-specific code out of start_event_loop Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:02 ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 08/17] Introduce and use flush_streams Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 15/17] Move gdb_notifier comment Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:06 ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 03/17] Move event-loop configury to common.m4 Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 07/17] Use warning in event-loop Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 14:02 ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 01/17] Remove include from event-loop.c Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 16/17] Remove gdb_fildes_t Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 11/17] Implement event-loop glue for gdbserver Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 16:52 ` [RFC 12/17] Add the ability to stop the event loop Tom Tromey
2019-02-24 17:14 ` [RFC 00/17] Merge event loop implementations Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-24 17:26 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2019-02-24 17:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-25 19:57 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-25 20:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-25 20:55 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-26 16:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-02-26 16:23 ` Tom Tromey
2019-02-26 16:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-09-26 17:47 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-26 23:09 ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-27 13:53 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-27 14:05 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-27 14:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-09-27 14:53 ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-27 15:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-09-27 19:10 ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-14 2:22 ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-14 17:58 ` Pedro Alves
2020-02-14 18:36 ` Tom Tromey
2019-10-04 22:25 ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-14 18:20 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87va19jdy4.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox