From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Implement support for SystemTap probes on userspace
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sjhdoak9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83haxwzy92.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:55:05 +0200")
>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
Eli> May I suggest that the new command be called "info stap-probes"
Eli> instead? IMO, "probe" is much too general, and may conflict in the
Eli> future with some other feature that uses similar facilities or
Eli> terminology.
I think this change would make it seem like these probe points are
somehow less generic than UST static markers from the gdb point of view
-- but they are not, in fact they are more generic because they aren't
restricted to just being used in tracepoints.
We did look at unifying the support between UST and sdt.h probes, but
this seemed not very doable.
Tom
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-12 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-09 20:29 Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-03-09 20:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] Refactor internal variable mechanism Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-03-09 21:03 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-10 4:02 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-03-09 20:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] Use longjmp and exception probes when available Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-03-09 20:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] Implement new features needed for handling SystemTap probes Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-03-10 8:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-03-10 16:56 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-03-12 15:11 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-13 8:58 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-03-13 16:06 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-03-15 20:44 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-16 14:52 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-03-16 18:17 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-10 19:22 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-12 20:37 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-12 23:15 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-15 15:40 ` Pedro Alves
2012-03-15 15:36 ` Pedro Alves
2012-03-15 20:50 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-09 21:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] Implement support for SystemTap probes on userspace Tom Tromey
2012-03-10 3:51 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-03-10 7:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-03-10 8:55 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-10 9:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-03-10 15:52 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-03-12 19:59 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sjhdoak9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox