Re: [PATCH 2/3] gdbsupport: make filtered_iterator work with pointers

[Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>]

>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> writes:

>> I also wonder what this constructor is even needed for since it seems
>> like a filtered iterator should just wrap an ordinary one anyway.

Simon> I think it's just a shortcut to have less boilerplate when you need to
Simon> instantiate a filtered_iterator.  I think I would prefer having just the
Simon> begin/end version, so that there is less magic involved, making it
Simon> easier to debug compilation errors, at the expense of having to be more
Simon> explicit at the call sites.  I think I tried it in a previous iteration
Simon> of this series and gave up, but if you think it's a good idea, I can try
Simon> it again.

I think you should go ahead, we can try to remove the template
constructor after.

Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>

Tom