From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Stephan Rohr <stephan.rohr@intel.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gdb: set the cache information in 'get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle'
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:06:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87se69wdbt.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625145850.3104079-2-stephan.rohr@intel.com> (Stephan Rohr's message of "Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:58:50 +0000")
>>>>> Stephan Rohr <stephan.rohr@intel.com> writes:
> From: "Rohr, Stephan" <stephan.rohr@intel.com>
> 'get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle' retrieves the previous frame and
> computes the frame id. At this point, the frame id is not cached yet,
> which prevents the frame from being reinflated once the frane cache is
s/frane/frame/
> 1. Build the 'prev_frame' and eventually calls
> 'get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle'. The frame_id is only computed
> for the raw frame pointer, the wrapping 'frame_info_ptr' it not
> updated.
s/it not/is not/
> + /* No cycle and the frame is added to the frame stash, update the cache
> + information to ensure the frame can be reinflated after the cache is
> + flushed. */
> + if (prev_frame)
> + prev_frame.update_cache ();
> +
I wonder if some other approach could be taken here.
It seems unfortunate to have to add a new public method to this class
just to work around some sort of ordering issue.
That said I'm not sure I understand the problem well enough to suggest a
better solution. Like should maybe get_prev_frame_raw not return a
frame_info_ptr? And then the frame_info_ptr be created after the call
to frame_stash_add in get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle?
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 14:58 [PATCH 0/1] " Stephan Rohr
2026-06-25 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Stephan Rohr
2026-06-26 15:06 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2026-06-29 14:04 ` Rohr, Stephan
2026-07-06 15:06 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-07-07 7:57 ` Rohr, Stephan
2026-07-07 16:04 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-07-08 8:46 ` Rohr, Stephan
2026-07-08 13:59 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-07-08 15:18 ` Rohr, Stephan
2026-07-14 15:14 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-07-15 7:33 ` Rohr, Stephan
2026-07-18 11:57 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-07-20 17:39 ` Tom Tromey
2026-07-07 10:33 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-07-07 12:25 ` Rohr, Stephan
2026-07-07 15:04 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87se69wdbt.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=stephan.rohr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox