From: "Rohr, Stephan" <stephan.rohr@intel.com>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] gdb: set the cache information in 'get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle'
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 15:18:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DS7PR11MB6247ED607136375770BFA55893FF2@DS7PR11MB6247.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h5m9fuqi.fsf@redhat.com>
Hi Andrew,
Two more nits for the commit message, see my comment bellow.
Thanks
Stephan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 July 2026 15:59
> To: Rohr, Stephan <stephan.rohr@intel.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] gdb: set the cache information in
> 'get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle'
>
> "Rohr, Stephan" <stephan.rohr@intel.com> writes:
>
> > HI Andrew,
> >
> > Thanks for sharing. The patch itself looks good.
> >
> > I have a few comments regarding the commit message, see below.
>
> Thanks Stephan. Below is an updated patch with an improved commit
> message. I also tweaked some of the comments in the actual code as,
> upon re-reading, I found some of them not ideal.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> ---
>
> commit cec35caa5c173de5e98a9ac6cbc0b8ee8e15d912
> Author: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu Jun 25 14:58:50 2026 +0000
>
> gdb: set frame_info_ptr::m_cached_id during invalidation
>
> Currently frame_info_ptr caches the frame_id at construction time, see
> frame_info_ptr::frame_info_ptr in frame.c. The problem with this is
> that a frame's frame-id might not be known at this point.
>
> Consider get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle, this calls
> get_prev_frame_raw to create the previous frame, placing the result
> into a frame_info_ptr PREV_FRAME. Then (for frames other than frame
> 0) compute_frame_id is called, however, this only computes the
> frame_id for the frame_info object pointed to by the frame_info_ptr,
> the cached frame_id within the frame_info_ptr itself is not updated.
>
This is a long sentence. Consider splitting into two to improve readability.
> What this means is that in get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle, the
> PREV_FRAME local has no cached frame-id.
>
> If we consider the call stack:
>
> get_selected_frame
> lookup_selected_frame
> frame_find_by_id
> get_prev_frame
> get_prev_frame_always
> get_prev_frame_always_1
> get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle
>
> Then what we see is that the frame_info_ptr created in
> get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle, which lacks a cached frame_id, can
> be passed all the way back to lookup_selected_frame, where it will be
> stored in the SELECTED_FRAME global by a call to select_frame. The
> outer get_selected_frame call (in the above backtrace) will then
> return the SELECTED_FRAME global, which lacks a cached frame-id.
>
> If GDB ever tries to reinflate the SELECTED_FRAME frame_info_ptr (or a
> copy of it), then we will trigger the assert:
> `gdb_assert (frame_id_p (m_cached_id));` which can be found in
> `frame_info_ptr::reinflate` in frame.c.
>
> An example of how this can be triggered is included in the updated
> test case:
>
> - The 'up' command sets the selected frame to a frame with
> level > 0.
> - An inferior call invalidates the selected frame.
> - The selected frame is rebuilt following the call-stack above.
> The wrapping frame_info_ptr object doesn't cache the frame-id.
> - The 'frame' command invokes another inferior call for the pretty
> printer, which flushes the frame cache.
> - The frame_info_ptr is reinflated, e.g., to print the next
> argument, and this hits the assertion mentioned above.
>
> The problem is that frames don't always know their frame-id when they
> are placed into a frame_info_ptr, but they always do (for frames other
> than #0) after get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle has finished. This
> commit defers caching the frame-id in the frame_info_ptr until the
> frame cache is being flushed, at which point the frame-id is known.
>
I think we shouldn't focus on 'get_prev_frame_maybe_check_cycle' solely, though
I didn't find any other location where the described behaviour could reproduce
(which doesn't mean it doesn't exist).
Maybe generalize a bit more, e.g.:
The problem is that a frame_info_ptr relies on a computed frame-id upon
construction time to cache the frame-id. This commit defers caching
the frame-id in the frame_info_ptr until the frame cache is being flushed,
at which point the frame-id is known.
I'm not sure if 'defer' is the correct wording as the frame_info_ptr ctor still
sets the frame-id. Maybe change to 'updates the frame-id'.
> Co-Authored-By: Rohr, Stephan <stephan.rohr@intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c
> index cefdde5ed1e..a0a982dc866 100644
> --- a/gdb/frame.c
> +++ b/gdb/frame.c
> @@ -2190,15 +2190,18 @@ reinit_frame_cache (void)
> sentinel_frame = nullptr;
> }
>
> + /* Invalidation copies the frame-id from the managed frame_info object
> + into the frame_info_ptr, so this must run before the frame_info
> + objects are freed (via obstack_free). */
> + for (frame_info_ptr &iter : frame_info_ptr::frame_list)
> + iter.invalidate ();
> +
> frame_stash_invalidate ();
>
> /* Since we can't really be sure what the first object allocated was. */
> obstack_free (&frame_cache_obstack, 0);
> obstack_init (&frame_cache_obstack);
>
> - for (frame_info_ptr &iter : frame_info_ptr::frame_list)
> - iter.invalidate ();
> -
> frame_debug_printf ("generation=%d", frame_cache_generation);
> }
>
> @@ -3436,9 +3439,24 @@ frame_info_ptr::frame_info_ptr (struct
> frame_info *ptr)
> return;
>
> m_cached_level = ptr->level;
> +}
>
> +void
> +frame_info_ptr::invalidate ()
> +{
> + if (m_ptr == nullptr)
> + return;
> +
> + gdb_assert (m_cached_level == m_ptr->level);
> +
> + /* If a frame_info_ptr is invalidated multiple times (with a reinflate
> + call between) then we will end up updating m_cached_id multiple times.
> + This should be harmless as the underlying frame_id should never
> + change. */
> if (m_cached_level != 0 || m_ptr->this_id.value.user_created_p)
> m_cached_id = m_ptr->this_id.value;
> +
> + m_ptr = nullptr;
> }
>
> /* See frame-info-ptr.h. */
> diff --git a/gdb/frame.h b/gdb/frame.h
> index f6553fb7b6d..b386303d895 100644
> --- a/gdb/frame.h
> +++ b/gdb/frame.h
> @@ -327,10 +327,7 @@ class frame_info_ptr : public
> intrusive_list_node<frame_info_ptr>
> }
>
> /* Invalidate this pointer. */
> - void invalidate ()
> - {
> - m_ptr = nullptr;
> - }
> + void invalidate ();
>
> private:
> /* We sometimes need to construct frame_info_ptr objects around the
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/pretty-print-call-by-hand.exp
> b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/pretty-print-call-by-hand.exp
> index 52162fc9952..a2a29c4d0f8 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/pretty-print-call-by-hand.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/pretty-print-call-by-hand.exp
> @@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ with_test_prefix "frame movement down" {
> with_test_prefix "frame movement up" {
> if { [start_test "TAG: final frame"] == 0 } {
> gdb_test "up" [multi_line "#1 .*in g \\(mt=mytype is .*\\,
> depth=1\\).*" ".*first frame.*"]
> + gdb_test "p f ()" " = 2"
> + gdb_test "frame" [multi_line "#1 .*in g \\(mt=mytype is .*\\,
> depth=1\\).*" ".*first frame.*"]
> }
> }
>
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Dornacher Strasse 1, 85622 Feldkirchen, Germany
Tel: +49 89 991 430, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Harry Demas, Jeffrey Schneiderman, Yin Chong Sorrell
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Seat: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 14:58 [PATCH 0/1] " Stephan Rohr
2026-06-25 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Stephan Rohr
2026-06-26 15:06 ` Tom Tromey
2026-06-29 14:04 ` Rohr, Stephan
2026-07-06 15:06 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-07-07 7:57 ` Rohr, Stephan
2026-07-07 16:04 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-07-08 8:46 ` Rohr, Stephan
2026-07-08 13:59 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-07-08 15:18 ` Rohr, Stephan [this message]
2026-07-14 15:14 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-07-15 7:33 ` Rohr, Stephan
2026-07-18 11:57 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-07-20 17:39 ` Tom Tromey
2026-07-07 10:33 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-07-07 12:25 ` Rohr, Stephan
2026-07-07 15:04 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DS7PR11MB6247ED607136375770BFA55893FF2@DS7PR11MB6247.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=stephan.rohr@intel.com \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox