From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: "Jan Vraný" <Jan.Vrany@labware.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
"tom@tromey.com" <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 04/18] gdb: introduce new function create_function_type
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:21:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ldpdw9h4.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17a4934e792dc1eafd90477b34e3c68f93fea1da.camel@labware.com> ("Jan =?utf-8?Q?Vran=C3=BD=22's?= message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2025 11:12:52 +0000")
>> Anyway the main question here is whether this drops a check_typedef.
Jan> is_void() does drop the check_typedef().
That would be bad if it did, but I think when I looked at the patch, it
did not?
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-27 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-23 16:09 [RFC v5 00/19] Add Python "JIT" API Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:09 ` [RFC v5 01/18] gdb: introduce expand_symtabs_maybe_overlapping Jan Vrany
2025-06-24 15:22 ` Tom Tromey
2025-06-26 15:05 ` Jan Vraný
2025-06-23 16:09 ` [RFC v5 02/18] gdb: introduce compunit_symtab::maybe_contains Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:09 ` [RFC v5 03/18] gdb: update is_addr_in_objfile to support "dynamic" objfiles Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:09 ` [RFC v5 04/18] gdb: introduce new function create_function_type Jan Vrany
2025-06-24 15:29 ` Tom Tromey
2025-06-26 11:12 ` Jan Vraný
2025-06-27 14:21 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2025-06-27 14:30 ` Jan Vraný
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 05/18] gdb/python: add function () method to gdb.Type object Jan Vrany
2025-06-24 16:11 ` Tom Tromey
2025-06-26 11:13 ` Jan Vraný
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 06/18] gdb: use std::vector<> to hold on blocks in struct blockvector Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 07/18] gdb/python: add gdb.Compunit Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 08/18] gdb/python: allow instantiation of gdb.Objfile from Python Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 09/18] gdb/python: add unlink () method to gdb.Objfile object Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 10/18] gdb/python: allow instantiation of gdb.Compunit from Python Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 11/18] gdb/python: allow instantiation of gdb.Symtab " Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 12/18] gdb/python: allow instantiation of gdb.Block " Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 13/18] gdb/python: allow instantiation of gdb.Symbol " Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 14/18] gdb/python: add add_symbol () method to gdb.Block Jan Vrany
2025-08-29 14:10 ` Andrew Burgess
2025-08-29 14:14 ` Andrew Burgess
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 15/18] gdb/python: add more attributes to gdb.LinetableEntry objects Jan Vrany
2025-08-29 14:00 ` Andrew Burgess
2025-09-02 11:03 ` Jan Vraný
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 16/18] gdb/python: allow instantiation of gdb.LineTableEntry objects Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 17/18] gdb/python: allow instantiation of gdb.LineTable objects Jan Vrany
2025-06-23 16:10 ` [RFC v5 18/18] gdb/python: add section in documentation on implementing JIT interface Jan Vrany
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ldpdw9h4.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=Jan.Vrany@labware.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox