From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
To: "Joos, Christina" <christina.joos@intel.com>
Cc: Luis <luis.machado.foss@gmail.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
"tom@tromey.com" <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] aarch64: Implement gdbarch function top_addr_empty_shadow_stack.
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 06:49:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jyp2suaw.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN7PR11MB7638FC805901B7BE8664CCF989AA2@SN7PR11MB7638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (Christina Joos's message of "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 11:14:34 +0000")
"Joos, Christina" <christina.joos@intel.com> writes:
> Hi Thiago,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
>> Sent: Samstag, 29. August 2026 07:25
>> To: Joos, Christina <christina.joos@intel.com>
>> Cc: Luis <luis.machado.foss@gmail.com>; gdb-patches@sourceware.org;
>> tom@tromey.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] aarch64: Implement gdbarch function
>> top_addr_empty_shadow_stack.
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> "Joos, Christina" <christina.joos@intel.com> writes:
>>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Luis <luis.machado.foss@gmail.com>
>> >> Sent: Donnerstag, 13. August 2026 00:13
>> >> To: Joos, Christina <christina.joos@intel.com>;
>> >> gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> >> Cc: tom@tromey.com; thiago.bauermann@linaro.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] aarch64: Implement gdbarch function
>> >> top_addr_empty_shadow_stack.
>> >>
>> >> On 08/07/2026 15:36, Christina Schimpe wrote:
>> >> > With the implementation of that gdbarch function we can remove the
>> >> > arch specific function aarch64_linux_dwarf2_prev_gcspr and use the
>> >> > generalized function dwarf2_prev_ssp instead.
>> >> >
>> >> > Co-Authored-By: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com>
>>
>> I don't understand what this tag means. Was this patch supposed to have
>> someone else as the author? If you're the only author, it can be dropped.
>
> As indicated here:
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2026-August/229149.html
>
> I think you're the author of this patch, and I am the Co-Author.
Ah, sorry. I missed that. Thanks!
--
Thiago
(he/him)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 14:36 [PATCH v4 00/13] Add new command to print the shadow stack backtrace Christina Schimpe
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] gdb: Generalize handling of the shadow stack pointer Christina Schimpe
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] aarch64: Implement gdbarch function top_addr_empty_shadow_stack Christina Schimpe
2026-08-12 22:13 ` Luis
2026-08-25 9:01 ` Joos, Christina
2026-08-29 5:24 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-08-30 11:14 ` Joos, Christina
2026-09-03 6:49 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2026-09-12 6:02 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] gdb: Add get_main_func_start_pc to refactor frame.c:inside_main_func Christina Schimpe
2026-09-03 6:53 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] gdb: Refactor 'stack.c:print_frame' Christina Schimpe
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] gdb: Introduce 'stack.c:print_pc' function without frame argument Christina Schimpe
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] gdb: Refactor 'find_symbol_funname' and 'info_frame_command_core' in stack.c Christina Schimpe
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] gdb: Refactor 'stack.c:print_frame_info' Christina Schimpe
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] gdb: Add command option 'bt -shadow' to print the shadow stack backtrace Christina Schimpe
2026-09-03 7:37 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-09-10 19:36 ` Joos, Christina
2026-09-12 5:52 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] gdb: Provide gdbarch hook to distinguish shadow stack backtrace elements Christina Schimpe
2026-09-03 7:44 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] gdb: Implement the hook 'is_no_return_shadow_stack_address' for amd64 linux Christina Schimpe
2026-09-03 7:49 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] gdb: Enable inferior calls in the shadow stack backtrace Christina Schimpe
2026-09-03 7:51 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] gdb: Enable signal trampolines " Christina Schimpe
2026-09-03 7:53 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-07-08 14:36 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] gdb, mi: Add -shadow-stack-list-frames command Christina Schimpe
2026-09-03 8:10 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-08-04 7:45 ` RE:[PATCH v4 00/13] Add new command to print the shadow stack backtrace Joos, Christina
2026-09-03 6:44 ` [PATCH " Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-09-10 19:42 ` Joos, Christina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jyp2suaw.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=christina.joos@intel.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luis.machado.foss@gmail.com \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox