From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <sipoyare@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gdb: extend SECURITY.txt to highlight additional remote debugging risks
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:08:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jynk48wz.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a336f8c7-1d33-4ab4-a2c5-7bb39fcb4957@redhat.com> (Siddhesh Poyarekar's message of "Tue, 13 Oct 2026 11:22:37 -0400")
>> + Additionally, when GDB connects to a remote target, it will, by
>> + default, automatically download the executable and shared libraries
>> + from the remote system and parse them locally, without prompting the
>> + user. This means that the risks described above relating to parsing
>> + malformed executables also apply when performing remote debugging.
>> + If the remote target is untrusted, or the connection to the remote
>> + target is untrusted, malicious or malformed binaries could be served
> This is a good guideline, but does not make clear if bugs in this
> processing will be treated as security issues. This is true for the
> line above as well, which this paragraph intends to augment - it warns
> the user that such behaviour is not good, but does not make a
> definitive statement whether bugs related to them will be treated as
> security issues or not.
I think it's relatively clear given these paragraphs:
GDB is not meant to be offered as a service (that is, offered
over an insecure connection to non-local users), and so denial of
service attacks targeting GDB itself, or other bugs that target
this use case, are not considered a security bug.
...
Any issues that arise from running an untrusted program outside of a
secure environment are not security bugs in GDB. Any issues that
arise from running an untrusted program through GDB inside a secure
environment are only security bugs if GDB is required in order to
trigger the issue.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 13:49 [PATCH 0/5] SECURITY.txt changes Andrew Burgess
2026-10-12 13:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] gdb: fix minor grammar error in SECURITY.txt Andrew Burgess
2026-10-14 15:02 ` Tom Tromey
2026-10-12 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] gdb: extend SECURITY.txt to highlight additional remote debugging risks Andrew Burgess
2026-10-13 15:22 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2026-10-14 15:08 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2026-10-14 16:10 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2026-10-16 14:24 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-10-16 14:27 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2026-10-12 13:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] gdb: extend SECURITY.txt discussion of DWARF/BFD parser bugs Andrew Burgess
2026-10-13 15:30 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2026-10-14 15:12 ` Tom Tromey
2026-10-14 16:16 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2026-10-14 17:28 ` Carlos O'Donell
2026-10-12 13:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] gdb: in SECURITY.txt, add notes on reporting exec and debug bugs Andrew Burgess
2026-10-12 13:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] gdb: improve SECURITY.txt relating to embedded language bugs Andrew Burgess
2026-10-14 15:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] SECURITY.txt changes Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jynk48wz.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sipoyare@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox