Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: qiyaoltc@gmail.com (Yao Qi), dje@google.com (Doug Evans),
	       brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker),
	       gdb-patches@sourceware.org (gdb-patches)
Subject: Re: Several regressions and we branch soon.
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 15:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87io9eyih6.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150710162332.182E6B042@oc7340732750.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's	message of "Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:23:32 +0200 (CEST)")

On Fri, Jul 10 2015, Ulrich Weigand wrote:

> Andreas Arnez wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 10 2015, Yao Qi wrote:
>
>> GCC5 on ppc64le emits the ABI warning even in absence of "-mcpu=".
>> Again it should help to add "-Wno-psabi".
>
> Yes, for ppc64 we definitely should add -Wno-psabi.

OK.

>> Yes.  But in this case no vector ABI is used, because that test machine
>> does not have a vector facility and because -march=native is not
>> supported by GCC (yet).  Thus vector return values are not passed in
>> vector registers, but according to RETURN_VALUE_STRUCT_CONVENTION.  And
>> then we hit the problem that displaying such return values is not
>> supported by GDB: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8549
>
> Hmm.  Since this is a separate problem independent of vector support,
> maybe this test case should accept the failure to display struct return
> values, and pass the test (or maybe KFAIL?).

Sure, that's an option.  I prefer KFAIL, such that it's easy to find
(and remove) when the bug is fixed.

Here's a patch for both of the suggested changes.  OK to apply?

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] gnu_vector.exp: Avoid some more known FAILs

This avoids two more types of FAILs with the gnu_vector test case.

First, for POWER targets newer GCCs emit an ABI note when invoked with
"-mcpu=native".  Then the test case fell back to non-native compile,
producing code for a non-vector ABI.  But that is not supported by GDB.
Thus the compiler note is now suppressed with "-Wno-psabi".

Second, on s390 the test case produced FAILs after falling back to a
non-vector ABI when using "finish" or "return" in a vector-valued
function.  This was due to a long-standing known bug (Bug 8549).  This
case is now detected, and KFAILs are emitted instead.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gdb.base/gnu_vector.exp: Try compilation with "-mcpu=native
	-Wno-psabi" if "-mcpu=native" fails.  For the tests with "finish"
	and "return" use KFAIL when GDB can not read/write the vector
	return value.
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/gnu_vector.exp | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/gnu_vector.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/gnu_vector.exp
index 173da4d..0bef3f8 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/gnu_vector.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/gnu_vector.exp
@@ -25,11 +25,19 @@ standard_testfile .c
 # without a CPU option.  If all variants fail, assume that the
 # compiler can not handle GNU vectors.
 
-if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" ${binfile} executable {debug quiet additional_flags=-mcpu=native}] != ""
-     && [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" ${binfile} executable {debug quiet additional_flags=-march=native}] != ""
-     && [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" ${binfile} executable {debug quiet}] != ""} {
-    untested "compiler can't handle the vector_size attribute?"
-    return -1
+proc do_compile { {opts {}} } {
+    global srcdir subdir srcfile binfile
+    set ccopts {debug quiet}
+    foreach opt $opts {lappend ccopts "additional_flags=$opt"}
+    gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "$binfile" executable $ccopts
+}
+
+if { [do_compile {-mcpu=native}] != ""
+     && [do_compile {-mcpu=native -Wno-psabi}] != ""
+     && [do_compile {-march=native}] != ""
+     && [do_compile] != ""} {
+	untested "compiler can't handle vector_size attribute?"
+	return -1
 }
 
 clean_restart ${binfile}
@@ -195,14 +203,37 @@ gdb_test "print add_structvecs(i2, (struct just_int2)\{2*i2\}, (struct two_int2)
 gdb_test "print add_singlevecs((char1) \{6\}, (int1) \{12\}, (double1) \{24\})" "= \\{42\\}" \
     "call add_singlevecs"
 
-# Test vector return value handling with "finish" and "return".
+# Test "finish" from vector-valued function.
 gdb_breakpoint "add_some_intvecs"
 gdb_continue "add_some_intvecs"
-gdb_test "finish" "Value returned is .* = \\{10, 20, 48, 72\\}" \
-    "finish shows vector return value"
+set test "finish shows vector return value"
+gdb_test_multiple "finish" $test {
+    -re "Value returned is .* = \\{10, 20, 48, 72\\}.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+	pass $test
+    }
+    -re "Value returned has type: .* Cannot determine contents.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+	kfail "gdb/8549" $test
+    }
+}
+
+# Test "return" from vector-valued function.
 gdb_continue "add_some_intvecs"
-gdb_test "return (int4) \{4, 2, 7, 6\}" \
-    "#0 .* main .*" \
-    "set vector return value" \
-    "Make add_some_intvecs return now. .y or n.*" "y"
-gdb_test "continue" "4 2 7 6\r\n.*" "verify vector return value"
+set test "set vector return value"
+set ok 1
+gdb_test_multiple "return (int4) \{4, 2, 7, 6\}" $test {
+    -re "#0 .* main .*$gdb_prompt $" {
+	if { $ok } {
+	    pass $test
+	    gdb_test "continue" "4 2 7 6\r\n.*" "verify vector return value"
+	}
+    }
+    -re "The location .* is unknown.\r\n.* return value .* will be ignored.\r\n" {
+	kfail "gdb/8549" $test
+	set ok 0
+	exp_continue
+    }
+    -re "Make add_some_intvecs return now. .y or n. $" {
+	send_gdb "y\n"
+	exp_continue
+    }
+}
-- 
2.4.6


      reply	other threads:[~2015-07-20 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-23 18:31 Doug Evans
2015-06-23 18:55 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-23 19:03   ` Doug Evans
2015-06-23 20:17     ` Keith Seitz
2015-06-23 20:53       ` Doug Evans
2015-06-23 21:45         ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-24 11:55           ` Yao Qi
2015-06-25 16:35             ` Tedeschi, Walfred
2015-07-01  8:49               ` Yao Qi
     [not found]                 ` <AC542571535E904D8E8ADAE745D60B1944445D44@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com>
2015-07-01  9:30                   ` Walfred Tedeschi
2015-07-02 10:09                     ` Yao Qi
2015-07-02 15:34           ` Yao Qi
2015-07-02 16:19             ` [PATCH] Don't throw an error in "show mpx bound" implementation Patrick Palka
2015-07-06  9:31               ` Yao Qi
2015-06-24 10:21 ` Several regressions and we branch soon Yao Qi
     [not found]   ` <87lhf8yz90.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com>
2015-06-25 13:34     ` Doug Evans
2015-06-25 18:00       ` Andreas Arnez
2015-06-30 15:21         ` Yao Qi
2015-06-30 18:09           ` Andreas Arnez
2015-07-01  8:01             ` Yao Qi
2015-07-10  9:33             ` Yao Qi
2015-07-10 16:12               ` Andreas Arnez
2015-07-10 16:23                 ` Ulrich Weigand
2015-07-20 15:08                   ` Andreas Arnez [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87io9eyih6.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com \
    --to=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox