From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Andreas Arnez)
Cc: qiyaoltc@gmail.com (Yao Qi), dje@google.com (Doug Evans),
brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker),
gdb-patches@sourceware.org (gdb-patches)
Subject: Re: Several regressions and we branch soon.
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150710162332.182E6B042@oc7340732750.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zj34j8kl.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> from "Andreas Arnez" at Jul 10, 2015 06:12:10 PM
Andreas Arnez wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10 2015, Yao Qi wrote:
> GCC5 on ppc64le emits the ABI warning even in absence of "-mcpu=".
> Again it should help to add "-Wno-psabi".
Yes, for ppc64 we definitely should add -Wno-psabi.
> Yes. But in this case no vector ABI is used, because that test machine
> does not have a vector facility and because -march=native is not
> supported by GCC (yet). Thus vector return values are not passed in
> vector registers, but according to RETURN_VALUE_STRUCT_CONVENTION. And
> then we hit the problem that displaying such return values is not
> supported by GDB: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8549
Hmm. Since this is a separate problem independent of vector support,
maybe this test case should accept the failure to display struct return
values, and pass the test (or maybe KFAIL?).
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-23 18:31 Doug Evans
2015-06-23 18:55 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-23 19:03 ` Doug Evans
2015-06-23 20:17 ` Keith Seitz
2015-06-23 20:53 ` Doug Evans
2015-06-23 21:45 ` Patrick Palka
2015-06-24 11:55 ` Yao Qi
2015-06-25 16:35 ` Tedeschi, Walfred
2015-07-01 8:49 ` Yao Qi
[not found] ` <AC542571535E904D8E8ADAE745D60B1944445D44@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com>
2015-07-01 9:30 ` Walfred Tedeschi
2015-07-02 10:09 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-02 15:34 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-02 16:19 ` [PATCH] Don't throw an error in "show mpx bound" implementation Patrick Palka
2015-07-06 9:31 ` Yao Qi
2015-06-24 10:21 ` Several regressions and we branch soon Yao Qi
[not found] ` <87lhf8yz90.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com>
2015-06-25 13:34 ` Doug Evans
2015-06-25 18:00 ` Andreas Arnez
2015-06-30 15:21 ` Yao Qi
2015-06-30 18:09 ` Andreas Arnez
2015-07-01 8:01 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-10 9:33 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-10 16:12 ` Andreas Arnez
2015-07-10 16:23 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2015-07-20 15:08 ` Andreas Arnez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150710162332.182E6B042@oc7340732750.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox