From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>,
"'Tom Tromey'" <tom@tromey.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA 3/5] Use std::string, std::vector in rust-lang.c
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8737kq1urb.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ee42720-5b51-893e-b629-d39a573aa080@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:10:24 +0100")
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
Pedro> There's a GNU extension that I think is meant to make it possible
Pedro> for the debugger to treat uninitialized variables
Pedro> specially (DW_OP_GNU_uninit), though I don't think we do
Pedro> much with it.
There were never any docs for it :(
I think it probably should have been a piece-terminating operation but
it was never clear if this was how it was actually supposed to work.
I stuck a comment in dwarf_expr_require_composition to this effect back
in the day.
Pedro> Not sure gcc emits it, even.
It does, but I don't know under what conditions.
There's code in dwarf2out.c like:
if (initialized == VAR_INIT_STATUS_UNINITIALIZED)
add_loc_descr (&result, new_loc_descr (DW_OP_GNU_uninit, 0, 0));
I don't know when that happens though.
Perhaps this could be cleaned up a bit, say by making DW_OP_GNU_uninit a
piece terminator (I forget the official term here) and by changing gcc
to emit a location list that indicates that the object is uninitialized
until after the constructor is run. It might be a little friendlier to
users, dunno.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-23 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-22 17:51 [RFA 0/5] Some random C++-ification Tom Tromey
2016-09-22 17:51 ` [RFA 4/5] Use std::vector in objfiles.c Tom Tromey
2016-09-22 17:51 ` [RFA 2/5] Use std::string in cp-namespace.c Tom Tromey
2016-09-22 19:08 ` Pedro Alves
2016-09-22 20:56 ` Tom Tromey
2016-09-22 17:51 ` [RFA 3/5] Use std::string, std::vector in rust-lang.c Tom Tromey
2016-09-22 19:03 ` Pedro Alves
2016-09-22 19:24 ` Tom Tromey
2016-09-22 19:35 ` Pedro Alves
2016-09-22 20:37 ` Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <57e4328a.c3c4620a.59d5b.803fSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2016-09-23 9:44 ` Pedro Alves
2016-09-23 15:56 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2016-09-23 16:15 ` Pedro Alves
2016-09-22 17:51 ` [RFA 1/5] Use std::string in break-catch-sig.c Tom Tromey
2016-09-23 13:17 ` Yao Qi
2016-09-22 19:03 ` [RFA 5/5] Use std::string rather than dyn-string Tom Tromey
2016-09-22 19:10 ` [RFA 0/5] Some random C++-ification Pedro Alves
2016-09-22 19:15 ` Pedro Alves
2016-09-22 23:10 ` Trevor Saunders
2016-09-23 15:47 ` Tom Tromey
2016-09-23 15:49 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8737kq1urb.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox