From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Shahab Vahedi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Shahab Vahedi <shahab.vahedi@gmail.com>,
Shahab Vahedi <shahab@synopsys.com>,
Francois Bedard <fbedard@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arc: Write correct "eret" value during register collection
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 07:36:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rgyfxqd.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112134310.8544-1-shahab.vahedi@gmail.com> (Shahab Vahedi via Gdb-patches's message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:43:10 +0100")
>>>>> "Shahab" == Shahab Vahedi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
Shahab> * arc-linux-tdep.c (collect_register): Use "eret" value while
Shahab> still writing to "pc" register cache.
Shahab> collect_register (const struct regcache *regcache, struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
Shahab> int regnum, gdb_byte *buf)
Shahab> {
Shahab> + int offset;
Shahab> +
Shahab> /* Skip non-existing registers. */
Shahab> - if ((arc_linux_core_reg_offsets[regnum] == ARC_OFFSET_NO_REGISTER))
Shahab> + if (arc_linux_core_reg_offsets[regnum] == ARC_OFFSET_NO_REGISTER)
Shahab> return;
Shahab> + else
Shahab> + offset = arc_linux_core_reg_offsets[ARC_ERET_REGNUM];
I would drop the "else" here.
I didn't understand this patch. It unconditionally sets 'offset' to the
offset of ARC_ERET_REGNUM. But surely that can't be correct?
The assignment above does this, and so does...
Shahab> if (regnum == gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch))
Shahab> - regnum = ARC_ERET_REGNUM;
Shahab> - regcache->raw_collect (regnum, buf + arc_linux_core_reg_offsets[regnum]);
Shahab> + offset = arc_linux_core_reg_offsets[ARC_ERET_REGNUM];
... this one.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-12 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 13:43 Shahab Vahedi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-12 14:36 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2020-11-12 15:46 ` Shahab Vahedi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-12 15:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Shahab Vahedi via Gdb-patches
2020-11-12 15:43 ` Tom Tromey
2020-11-12 16:05 ` [PUSHED] " Shahab Vahedi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-04 10:57 ` [PUSHED gdb-10-branch] " Shahab Vahedi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-04 14:10 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-12-04 14:44 ` Shahab Vahedi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-04 14:53 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-12-04 15:38 ` Shahab Vahedi via Gdb-patches
2020-12-05 8:12 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871rgyfxqd.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=fbedard@synopsys.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=shahab.vahedi@gmail.com \
--cc=shahab@synopsys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox