Re: [PATCH] Fix usage of inferior_ptid in two thread_alive implementations

[Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>]

On 02/09/2017 04:46 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2017-02-08 07:40, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 02/07/2017 09:24 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>>> While inspecting some target code, I noticed that in these two
>>> implementations of thread_alive, inferior_ptid is referenced directly
>>> instead of using the ptid passed as parameters.  I guess that it is
>>> wrong, although I can't really test it in both cases.
>>
>> I can't test either, but it looks right to me.
> 
> Soooo.. is this an approval :) ?

OK by the end of the week to give a chance of area
maintainers or interested folks to comment.  E.g., Eli 
is the go32-nat.c maintainer and I don't mean to overstep,
though that bit does look obvious to me.  Mark or someone
with BSD access could want to comment on the BSD bit.  The
latter you could perhaps test on the compile farm, if you
have access.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves