[PATCH] Add autoload-breakpoints [0/7]

[PATCH] Add autoload-breakpoints [0/7]

[Hui Zhu]

Hi,

There are patches to make GDB support autoload-breakpoints.
It is:
1. it is set by the remote stub.
2. The remote stub can control autoload-breakpoints any time even if GDB 
is just control the inferior.
3. This support is for some special stub.

Thanks,
Hui

[OT] DKIM/DomainKeys headers in messages from this list

[Eli Zaretskii]

Starting from a couple of months ago, all the messages from this list
include the following two headers:

> Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
> Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys

Looking at the messages in the list archives in raw format, I don't
see these headers.  Also, if I get the same message twice, once
directly from the sender (because I'm explicitly CC'ed), the other
time from the list, the former message doesn't have these headers.  So
it looks like they are added by the list software.

Does anyone else see where those 2 annoying headers, or know where do
they come from?  Can they be removed, please?

Re: [OT] DKIM/DomainKeys headers in messages from this list

[Hui Zhu]

On 03/17/12 19:13, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Starting from a couple of months ago, all the messages from this list
> include the following two headers:
>
>> Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
>> Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
>
> Looking at the messages in the list archives in raw format, I don't
> see these headers.  Also, if I get the same message twice, once
> directly from the sender (because I'm explicitly CC'ed), the other
> time from the list, the former message doesn't have these headers.  So
> it looks like they are added by the list software.
>
> Does anyone else see where those 2 annoying headers, or know where do
> they come from?  Can they be removed, please?

My part didn't have them, both this mail or gmail.  I think is the admin 
of your mail server did something made you get it.

Thanks,
Hui

Re: [OT] DKIM/DomainKeys headers in messages from this list

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:42:32 +0800
> From: Hui Zhu <hui_zhu@mentor.com>
> CC: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> 
> > Does anyone else see where those 2 annoying headers, or know where do
> > they come from?  Can they be removed, please?
> 
> My part didn't have them, both this mail or gmail.  I think is the admin 
> of your mail server did something made you get it.

Then how come other email doesn't get it on the same mail server,
including the same messages I receive directly?

Re: [OT] DKIM/DomainKeys headers in messages from this list

[Jan Kratochvil]

On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:13:09 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Does anyone else see where those 2 annoying headers, or know where do
> they come from?  Can they be removed, please?

They are useful anti-spam feature, they come from:
	Ian Lance Taylor: Domain key for gcc.gnu.org
	http://sourceware.org/ml/overseers/2011-q4/msg00083.html


Regards,
Jan

Re: [OT] DKIM/DomainKeys headers in messages from this list

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:34:32 +0100
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:13:09 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Does anyone else see where those 2 annoying headers, or know where do
> > they come from?  Can they be removed, please?
> 
> They are useful anti-spam feature, they come from:
> 	Ian Lance Taylor: Domain key for gcc.gnu.org
> 	http://sourceware.org/ml/overseers/2011-q4/msg00083.html

Thanks.

Re: [PATCH] Add autoload-breakpoints [0/7]

[Yao Qi]

On 03/17/2012 04:51 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> There are patches to make GDB support autoload-breakpoints.

For avoid of doubt, here is a high level description of these patches:

Prior to GDB connects to remote stub, some breakpoints might have been
already set in target, either by a prior GDB session or by the program
itself through some special system API.  When GDB connects to target, it
should handle these existing breakpoints from remote stub.  We call
these breakpoints as "auotload breakpoints".

> It is:
> 1. it is set by the remote stub.
> 2. The remote stub can control autoload-breakpoints any time even if GDB
> is just control the inferior.

The other use case we want to support in GDB is that inferior may
delete/clear breakpoints on its own, and remote stub gets GDB notified,
and GDB can take some actions accordingly.  We believe such reliable
report is useful to GDB, and generalize it, called "ReportAsync".

The connection between "ReportAsync" and "autoload breakpoint" is when
inferior/stub delete breakpoints, sends async report to GDB about
removed breakpoints.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)