From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26803 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2012 16:34:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 26553 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2012 16:34:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:34:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2IGYaDP009198 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 18 Mar 2012 12:34:36 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-28.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.28]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2IGYWBI009200 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Mar 2012 12:34:35 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:34:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [OT] DKIM/DomainKeys headers in messages from this list Message-ID: <20120318163432.GA2576@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <4F6450AF.5010609@mentor.com> <83r4wr32gq.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83r4wr32gq.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00667.txt.bz2 On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:13:09 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Does anyone else see where those 2 annoying headers, or know where do > they come from? Can they be removed, please? They are useful anti-spam feature, they come from: Ian Lance Taylor: Domain key for gcc.gnu.org http://sourceware.org/ml/overseers/2011-q4/msg00083.html Regards, Jan