Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com,
	markus.t.metzger@intel.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introduce gdb::unique_ptr
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83pon48i54.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <640356ae-74e2-bcba-6c89-26bfbcd4fe36@redhat.com> (message from	Pedro Alves on Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:35:58 +0100)

> Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com,
>         markus.t.metzger@intel.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:35:58 +0100
> 
> >> The newer compilers available as packages on these old distros
> >> (e.g., DTS on RHEL) do _not_ replace the system compiler.  They're
> >> installed in parallel, in separate directories.  You willfully add them
> >> to the PATH or pass an overridden CXX to configure/make if you want to 
> >> use them.
> > 
> > I don't see the difference, except for the worse: instead of one
> > compiler you now have two, so one could easily select the wrong one
> > when compiling some package.
> 
> You said:
> 
>  "upgrading the system compiler is a serious decision.  Installing a
>  newer compiler could easily break the build of several important
>  packages (...)"
> 
> And I'm telling you that the packages in question don't upgrade
> the system compiler at all.

Of course, they do: you have a newer compiler on your system, which is
about to be used for building some packages.

> There's no risk of "easily break" things.

Of course, there is: the new compiler will do that.

That one can go back to the old one doesn't help at all, because that
was also possible without a parallel installation: just uninstall the
new one and install back the old one.

Organizations rarely do this stuff.  You want to install a compiler
and let users use it without complications.  Most of your users aren't
hackers, they have no idea how to debug a package build problem.  They
will come back to you expecting that you fix the problem for them.

> There's nothing complicated here.

I respectfully disagree.  We most probably have very different
experience here, and very different users to deal with.


  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-13 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-10 16:46 [PATCH 0/3] More cleanup elimination / gdb::unique_ptr Pedro Alves
2016-10-10 16:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] 'struct parse_expression *' -> gdb::unique_ptr<expression> Pedro Alves
2016-10-10 16:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] Introduce gdb::unique_ptr Pedro Alves
2016-10-10 17:49   ` Simon Marchi
2016-10-10 18:03     ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-11  6:48   ` Metzger, Markus T
2016-10-11 10:23     ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-11 10:53       ` Andreas Schwab
2016-10-11 11:17       ` Metzger, Markus T
2016-10-11 11:43         ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-11 13:58           ` Yao Qi
2016-10-11 14:05           ` Trevor Saunders
2016-10-11 12:16       ` Joel Brobecker
2016-10-11 13:46         ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-11 14:47           ` Joel Brobecker
2016-10-11 15:17             ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-11 16:24               ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-11 16:58                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-11 17:41                   ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-11 18:37                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-11 19:19                       ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-11 20:47                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-11 21:32                           ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-12  6:34                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-12  8:11                               ` Metzger, Markus T
2016-10-12  9:31                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-12 10:12                                   ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-12 11:05                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-12 11:25                                       ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-12 11:45                                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-13 12:12                                           ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-12 10:28                                 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-12 11:07                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-12 11:19                                     ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-12 11:41                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-12 11:55                                         ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-13  0:38                                   ` [PATCH] Enable C++11 starting with gcc 4.8 (was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introduce gdb::unique_ptr) Pedro Alves
2016-10-13  0:45                                     ` [PATCH 1/2] gdb: Import AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX from the GNU Autoconf Archive Pedro Alves
2016-10-13  0:45                                     ` [PATCH 2/2] gdb: Enable C++11 if available Pedro Alves
2016-10-12  9:37                               ` [PATCH 1/3] Introduce gdb::unique_ptr Pedro Alves
2016-10-12 10:51                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-12 11:15                                   ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-12 11:40                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-12 11:45                                   ` Jan Kratochvil
2016-10-12 11:56                                     ` Luis Machado
2016-10-12 12:03                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-13  9:07                                       ` Jan Kratochvil
2016-10-13 10:07                                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-13 10:27                                           ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-13 13:22                                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-13 13:36                                               ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-13 13:59                                                 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2016-10-13 14:04                                                   ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-13 15:06                                                     ` Joel Brobecker
2016-10-13 10:46                                           ` Jan Kratochvil
2016-10-13 11:15                                             ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-13 13:28                                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-13 13:42                                               ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-13 14:07                                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-11 19:23                       ` Simon Marchi
2016-10-11 20:54                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-11 21:28                           ` Simon Marchi
2016-10-12  6:23                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-11 21:16                         ` Jan Kratochvil
2016-10-11 17:15                 ` Luis Machado
2016-10-11 18:21                   ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-10 16:58 ` [PATCH 0/3] More cleanup elimination / gdb::unique_ptr Pedro Alves
2016-10-16  7:05   ` Tom Tromey
2016-10-17 13:57     ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-17 14:07       ` Tom Tromey
2016-10-17 14:59         ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-20 13:46   ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83pon48i54.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox