Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] python: Add qualified parameter to gdb.Breakpoint
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 14:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83efo5wbke.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512686013-24658-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com>	(message from Simon Marchi on Thu, 7 Dec 2017 17:33:33 -0500)

> From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
> CC: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 17:33:33 -0500
> 
> This patch adds the possibility to pass a qualified=True|False parameter
> when creating a breakpoint in Python.  It is equivalent to using
> -qualified in a linespec.  The parameter actually accepts any Python
> value, and converts it to boolean using Python's standard rules for
> that (https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#truth).
> 
> Unlike the -source/-line/-function/-label parameters, it is possible to
> use -qualified with a "normal" (non-explicit) linespec.  Therefore, it
> is possible (unlike these other parameters) to use this new parameter
> along with the spec parameter.
> 
> I updated the py-breakpoint.exp test.  To be able to test multiple
> locations using a namespace, I had to switch the test case to compile as
> C++.  If we really wanted to, we could run it as both C and C++, but
> omit the C++-specific parts when running it as C.
> 
> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* location.h (string_to_event_location): Add match_type
> 	parameter.
> 	* location.c (string_to_event_location): Likewise.
> 	* python/py-breakpoint.c (bppy_init): Handle qualified
> 	parameter.
> 
> gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* python.texi (Manipulating breakpoints using Python): Document
> 	qualified parameter to gdb.Breakpoint.
> 
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* gdb.python/py-breakpoint.c (foo_ns::multiply): New function.
> 	* gdb.python/py-breakpoint.exp: Compile the test case as c++,
> 	call test_bkpt_qualified.
> 	(test_bkpt_qualified): New proc.

OK for the documentation part.  (Do we need a NEWS entry?)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-08 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-07 22:34 Simon Marchi
2017-12-08 12:05 ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-08 18:42   ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-13 13:17     ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-13 16:45       ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-08 14:15 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2017-12-08 18:27   ` Simon Marchi
2017-12-08 19:47     ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83efo5wbke.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox