From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, simon.marchi@polymtl.ca,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GDB 7.99.91 MinGW compilation error in cli-script.c
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 14:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83d1avk7ob.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85877f9a-707d-dd19-f287-5fb1db3bc783@redhat.com> (message from Pedro Alves on Fri, 26 May 2017 15:10:01 +0100)
> Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, simon.marchi@polymtl.ca, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 15:10:01 +0100
>
> > So the convention is to include the full qualifier of every method?
> > Including the namespace of the class? Does that include the whole
> > chain of namespaces up to the root? If not, where does one stop?
>
> I admit that I'm puzzled about you having an issue with
> gdb::to_string, when your original entry said "(std::to_string)",
> not "(to_string)".
I did that because of the different namespaces involved in that
particular change. But that was an exception: I normally don't look
too hard at what Emacs's add-log commands produce in the parentheses,
I just trust it to DTRT. Having to manually correct that in each case
is a complication.
> I think the convention is to provide enough qualifiers to
> to make it convenient to search/see what function was changed.
> For class methods, I think we should include the class name,
> otherwise it can get ambiguous. I'm fine with not mentioning
> the namespace when otherwise it's obvious or redundant. E.g.,
> if all of gdb was in namespace gdb [it's not], it'd probably not
> make much sense to keep putting "gdb::" everywhere. But when
> referring to a symbol outside gdb's namespace, I'd think it wise to
> mention the namespace, so that it's clearer what the entry
> is referring to.
Well, I suggest to document these conventions somewhere, like the
Wiki. I don't think they are self-evident, and standards.texi doesn't
say anything about qualifying method names, it just tells to use the
Emacs add-log commands and the related VC features.
> I never managed to get used to using emacs commands to write the ChangeLog.
> I write ChangeLog entries manually, directly in the git commit log,
> while scrolling through the diff, as last "self review" event, and
> then copy over to the ChangeLog file at push time.
You will find some advice for a better workflow in the CONTRIBUTE file
in the Emacs repository
(http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/CONTRIBUTE).
I've just asked the CC Mode maintainer to allow the add-log commands
to not strip the class qualifiers. But namespace qualifiers will
still have to be added by hand, I'm afraid, which is a bit of a
nuisance, IMO.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-26 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-04 19:44 GDB 7.99.91 available for testing Joel Brobecker
2017-05-08 14:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-17 11:36 ` Yao Qi
2017-05-17 14:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-08 15:00 ` GDB 7.99.91 MinGW compilation error in cli-script.c Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-14 3:19 ` Simon Marchi
2017-05-14 14:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-17 14:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-05-17 16:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-19 9:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-19 9:49 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-19 11:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-19 11:23 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-21 15:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-22 15:26 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-22 18:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-23 9:53 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-24 2:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-25 10:05 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-26 7:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-26 11:52 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-26 12:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-26 13:58 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-24 18:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-24 19:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-05-25 10:12 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-26 7:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-26 10:54 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-26 13:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-26 14:10 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-26 14:35 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2017-05-26 14:45 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-08 15:02 ` GDB 7.99.91 MinGW compilation warning in tui.c Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-09 10:17 ` Yao Qi
2017-05-13 8:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-17 16:26 ` Yao Qi
2017-05-17 16:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-17 18:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-05-19 8:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-19 9:54 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-19 11:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-19 11:25 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-19 12:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-19 13:58 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-19 14:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-19 17:50 ` DJ Delorie
2017-05-19 17:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-15 21:11 ` GDB 7.99.91 available for testing Simon Marchi
2017-05-16 13:51 ` Simon Marchi
2017-05-16 20:50 ` Yao Qi
2017-05-16 21:22 ` Simon Marchi
2017-05-16 21:40 ` Yao Qi
2017-05-17 11:31 ` [PATCH master/8.0] Add alias command to cmd_list_element Yao Qi
2017-05-17 12:16 ` Simon Marchi
2017-05-17 13:36 ` Yao Qi
2017-05-16 14:28 ` GDB 7.99.91 available for testing Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83d1avk7ob.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox