* [Patch][Python] PR python/13285 Document named constants for frame unwind stop reasons
@ 2011-10-13 12:39 Kevin Pouget
2011-10-13 13:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Pouget @ 2011-10-13 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: pmuldoon, gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1018 bytes --]
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> Why not use the supplied gdb constants in this case? "2" does not map
>>> to any enum.
>>> IE gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_NO_REASON
>
> Kevin> it looks like these enums are not documented, are they? I can't grep
> Kevin> 'FRAME_UNWIND_NO_REASON' in gdb.texinfo
>
> Yeah, we should document those.
> I filed: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13285
>
> Tom
Hello,
I've prepared a bit of documentation for these named constants, based
on their comments in the source code.
The concept of frame ID (struct frame_id) is not exposed in the Python
interface, but I'm not sure that the constants could be explained
without this idea.
Thanks,
Kevin
2011-10-13 Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@st.com>
PR python/13285 Document named constants for frame unwind stop reasons
* gdb.texinfo (Frames In Python): Document gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_*
constants.
[-- Attachment #2: gdb.texinfo.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1684 bytes --]
diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
index da04e2e..e4bc5a1 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
@@ -23414,7 +23414,51 @@ newest frame.
Return an integer representing the reason why it's not possible to find
more frames toward the outermost frame. Use
@code{gdb.frame_stop_reason_string} to convert the value returned by this
-function to a string.
+function to a string. The value can be one of:
+
+@table @code
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_NO_REASON
+No particular reason.
+@end table
+
+@table @code
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_NULL_ID
+The previous frame's analyzer returns an invalid result.
+@end table
+
+@table @code
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_OUTERMOST
+This frame is the outermost.
+@end table
+
+@table @code
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_UNAVAILABLE
+Cannot unwind further, because that would require knowing the
+values of registers or memory that have not been collected.
+@end table
+
+@table @code
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_INNER_ID
+This frame ID looks like it ought to belong to a NEXT frame,
+but we got it for a PREV frame. Normally, this is a sign of
+unwinder failure. It could also indicate stack corruption.
+@end table
+
+@table @code
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_SAME_ID
+This frame has the same ID as the previous one. That means
+that unwinding further would almost certainly give us another
+frame with exactly the same ID, so break the chain. Normally,
+this is a sign of unwinder failure. It could also indicate
+stack corruption.
+@end table
+
+@table @code
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_NO_SAVED_PC
+The frame unwinder did not find any saved PC, but we needed
+one to unwind further.
+@end table
+
@end defun
@defun Frame.pc ()
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch][Python] PR python/13285 Document named constants for frame unwind stop reasons
2011-10-13 12:39 [Patch][Python] PR python/13285 Document named constants for frame unwind stop reasons Kevin Pouget
@ 2011-10-13 13:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-13 14:06 ` Kevin Pouget
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2011-10-13 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Pouget; +Cc: tromey, pmuldoon, gdb-patches
> From: Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:39:16 +0200
> Cc: pmuldoon@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> I've prepared a bit of documentation for these named constants, based
> on their comments in the source code.
Thanks.
> +@table @code
> +@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_NO_REASON
> +No particular reason.
This begs for some explanation of when this "no-reason" reason will be
seen. Is it true that this value is used when it's NOT impossible to
find more frames? If so, we should say that explicitly.
> +@end table
There's no need to make each value a separate @table. You can just
make them all be a single table, like this:
@table @code
@item foo
Description of foo.
@item bar
Description of bar.
...
@end @table.
OK with those changes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch][Python] PR python/13285 Document named constants for frame unwind stop reasons
2011-10-13 13:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2011-10-13 14:06 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-14 11:57 ` Kevin Pouget
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Pouget @ 2011-10-13 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: tromey, pmuldoon, gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1352 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:39:16 +0200
> > Cc: pmuldoon@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> >
> > I've prepared a bit of documentation for these named constants, based
> > on their comments in the source code.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > +@table @code
> > +@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_NO_REASON
> > +No particular reason.
>
> This begs for some explanation of when this "no-reason" reason will be
> seen. Is it true that this value is used when it's NOT impossible to
> find more frames? If so, we should say that explicitly.
Yes, that's my understanding too. I've changed the sentence to
> No particular reason (older frames should be available).
I'll commit the patch in an hour, if no one contradicts
> > +@end table
>
> There's no need to make each value a separate @table. You can just
> make them all be a single table, like this:
>
> @table @code
> @item foo
> Description of foo.
> @item bar
> Description of bar.
> ...
> @end @table.
sorry, I don't know where I got it from !
2011-10-13 Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@st.com>
PR python/13285 Document named constants for frame unwind stop reasons
* gdb.texinfo (Frames In Python): Document gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_*
constants.
[-- Attachment #2: gdb.texinfo.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1563 bytes --]
diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
index da04e2e..0aa90eb 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
@@ -23414,7 +23414,39 @@ newest frame.
Return an integer representing the reason why it's not possible to find
more frames toward the outermost frame. Use
@code{gdb.frame_stop_reason_string} to convert the value returned by this
-function to a string.
+function to a string. The value can be one of:
+
+@table @code
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_NO_REASON
+No particular reason (older frames should be available).
+
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_NULL_ID
+The previous frame's analyzer returns an invalid result.
+
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_OUTERMOST
+This frame is the outermost.
+
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_UNAVAILABLE
+Cannot unwind further, because that would require knowing the
+values of registers or memory that have not been collected.
+
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_INNER_ID
+This frame ID looks like it ought to belong to a NEXT frame,
+but we got it for a PREV frame. Normally, this is a sign of
+unwinder failure. It could also indicate stack corruption.
+
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_SAME_ID
+This frame has the same ID as the previous one. That means
+that unwinding further would almost certainly give us another
+frame with exactly the same ID, so break the chain. Normally,
+this is a sign of unwinder failure. It could also indicate
+stack corruption.
+
+@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_NO_SAVED_PC
+The frame unwinder did not find any saved PC, but we needed
+one to unwind further.
+@end table
+
@end defun
@defun Frame.pc ()
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch][Python] PR python/13285 Document named constants for frame unwind stop reasons
2011-10-13 14:06 ` Kevin Pouget
@ 2011-10-14 11:57 ` Kevin Pouget
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Pouget @ 2011-10-14 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: tromey, gdb-patches
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:39:16 +0200
>> > Cc: pmuldoon@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> >
>> > I've prepared a bit of documentation for these named constants, based
>> > on their comments in the source code.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> > +@table @code
>> > +@item gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_NO_REASON
>> > +No particular reason.
>>
>> This begs for some explanation of when this "no-reason" reason will be
>> seen. Is it true that this value is used when it's NOT impossible to
>> find more frames? If so, we should say that explicitly.
>
> Yes, that's my understanding too. I've changed the sentence to
>> No particular reason (older frames should be available).
>
> I'll commit the patch in an hour, if no one contradicts
>
>> > +@end table
>>
>> There's no need to make each value a separate @table. You can just
>> make them all be a single table, like this:
>>
>> @table @code
>> @item foo
>> Description of foo.
>> @item bar
>> Description of bar.
>> ...
>> @end @table.
>
> sorry, I don't know where I got it from !
>
> 2011-10-13 Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@st.com>
>
> PR python/13285 Document named constants for frame unwind stop reasons
> * gdb.texinfo (Frames In Python): Document gdb.FRAME_UNWIND_*
> constants.
>
commited: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-10/msg00112.html
thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-14 11:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-13 12:39 [Patch][Python] PR python/13285 Document named constants for frame unwind stop reasons Kevin Pouget
2011-10-13 13:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-13 14:06 ` Kevin Pouget
2011-10-14 11:57 ` Kevin Pouget
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox