Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>,
	Pedro Alves via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Make exec-file-mismatch compare build IDs
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 18:44:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d669d00-236a-cede-5c5e-3d65d3ee5a53@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tv0b7vy0.fsf@tromey.com>

On 5/19/20 5:04 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
> 
> Pedro> On 5/17/20 7:04 PM, Pedro Alves via Gdb-patches wrote:
>>> The patch makes GDB first try exec-file-mismatch validation via build
>>> IDs, and then if that isn't possible, fallback to validating using the
>>> old method of comparing filenames.  I'd argue that we should remove
>>> the filename validation for causing too many false positives, though.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Pedro> Here's an updated version that removes the filename comparison.
> Pedro> I've kept the structure of the code the same, in case we
> Pedro> add some form of fallback later on.
> 
> It makes sense to me.
> I read these patches and they look good to me.

Thanks all for the reviews and discussions.  I've merged this now.

Pedro Alves



  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-19 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-17 18:04 [PATCH 0/3] " Pedro Alves
2020-05-17 18:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] Default gdb_bfd_open's fd parameter to -1 Pedro Alves
2020-05-17 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] Eliminate target_fileio_open_warn_if_slow Pedro Alves
2020-05-17 18:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] Make exec-file-mismatch compare build IDs Pedro Alves
2020-05-17 18:25   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-05-18 13:52     ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-18 13:55   ` [PATCH v2 " Pedro Alves
2020-05-18 14:21     ` Philippe Waroquiers
2020-05-19 15:43       ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-19 16:04     ` Tom Tromey
2020-05-19 17:44       ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2020-05-21 13:32         ` Philippe Waroquiers
2020-05-21 14:02           ` Pedro Alves
2020-05-21 14:23             ` Philippe Waroquiers
2020-05-21 14:27               ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6d669d00-236a-cede-5c5e-3d65d3ee5a53@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox