Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Correctly handle inline functions with dwz

[Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>]

On 1/26/26 4:33 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> The new indexer does not correctly handle inline functions when 'dwz'
> is used to compress the DWARF.  This series fixes the bug, cleaning up
> a number of other things on the way.
> 
> I've separately regression tested each patch in this series on x86-64
> Fedora 41.  I've also regression tested the series as a whole with the
> dwz, gdb-index, and debug-names boards.
> 
> Even with that I messed up somehow, so v1 didn't actually fix the bug
> in question.  I must have modified the patches after testing..?
> 
> Anyway in v2 I've moved the line recording the CU inclusion and added
> a comment explaining the placement.  I re-ran the aformentioned tests
> and didn't touch anything.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>

I will test this series on my CI that runs the testsuite with the
various DWARF boards.

In the mean time, there are some things that pre-commit suggests to fix:

codespell................................................................Failed
- hook id: codespell
- exit code: 65

gdb/dwarf2/cooked-index-worker.c:114: includee ==> include

check-whitespace.........................................................Failed
- hook id: check-whitespace
- exit code: 2

gdb/dwarf2/index-write.c:1314: indent with spaces.
+        {

Simon