From: Colin Smith <colins@google.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>,
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>,
colins@google.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Re: patch for printing 64-bit values in i386 registers; STABS format
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b2d5d5e03042810304dda64ec@mail.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030428153247.GA28501@nevyn.them.org>
> > BTW, what happens when there is an attempt to write a long long value?
> > GDB again assumes that it can write to contigious registers - the reason
> > why REGISTER_BYTE can't be killed.
>
> That ugliness could go away too with Mark's introduced method. GDB
> could be fixed to find the next register properly.
I forgot about the write case. It seems to route through write_register_bytes,
which is unfortunate because the register order problem is tougher to solve
there. It might make more sense to avoid using write_register_bytes up in
value_assign, having it iterate over the registers.
Mark, could you pass along your patch? I might be able to use it.
Thanks!
_____
colin
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVistaSoftware Debian GNU/Linux Developer
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-28 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-25 0:27 Colin Smith
2003-04-25 2:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-25 22:18 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-04-25 22:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-26 3:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-26 3:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-26 3:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-26 3:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-26 8:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-27 3:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-28 15:22 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-04-28 16:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-28 16:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-28 16:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-28 16:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-28 19:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-28 22:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-29 2:15 ` re-ordered i386 regcache Andrew Cagney
2003-04-29 4:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-29 14:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-29 15:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-29 15:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-30 3:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-30 14:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-30 18:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-28 20:06 ` Colin Smith [this message]
2003-04-28 0:51 ` patch for printing 64-bit values in i386 registers; STABS format Mark Kettenis
2003-04-28 16:18 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-28 17:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b2d5d5e03042810304dda64ec@mail.google.com \
--to=colins@google.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox