Re: patch for printing 64-bit values in i386 registers; STABS format

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>]

> On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 11:21:13PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> 
>>    Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:27:44 -0400
>>    From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
>> 
>>    Hey, Mark, this sounds very much like a change you proposed.  What ever
>>    happened to that patch?
>> 
>> It's still happily sitting in my tree :-(.  There didn't seem to be
>> any consensus on whether making this change was a good idea.  I still
>> think it is.  It's an improvement for the majority of our users, and
>> it isn't making things worse for others.  Do you think I should
>> re-submit my patch?
> 
> 
> I do, definitely.

FYI,

It's possible to fix this without adding an architecture method, or 
implementing location expressions (the penny just dropped).  The basic 
problem is the same as for the MIPS - need a custom register area.  Hence:

- define a sequence of nameless cooked ([NUM_REGS .. 
NUM_REGS+NUM_PSEUDO_REGS) range) registers ordered the way stabs would 
like them
- modify the existing stabs_regnum_to_regnum to map the messed up 
registers onto those values

Andrew